Scholarlink

<p>Arctic sea ice is a vital component of the global climate system and a key indicator of climate change. Collaborations between Western scientists and Indigenous Knowledge holders advance understanding of the cryosphere by integrating diverse observations of sea ice physics, ecosystems, and food webs. As interest in collaborative research grows, co-production of knowledge (CPK) has emerged as a leading participatory approach in Arctic research. This study reviews multidisciplinary literature on sea ice knowledge co-production using a systematic literature review. Of more than 65 000 peer-reviewed articles on sea ice, only 461 mention engagement with Arctic Indigenous communities, and just 25 explicitly describe collaborative engagement with communities. By highlighting the presence and absence of key CPK tools and concepts in existing research, we uncover gaps in the documentation and practice of sharing research benefits with communities and identify opportunities for transparency in CPK practice.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Co-production of Arctic sea ice knowledge: A systematic review

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月10日

查看全文
  • Maria Monakhova,
  • Abigail York,
  • Malory Peterson,
  • Jack Andrew McCracken Pringle,
  • Shauna BurnSilver,
  • Tatiana Degai

摘要

Arctic sea ice is a vital component of the global climate system and a key indicator of climate change. Collaborations between Western scientists and Indigenous Knowledge holders advance understanding of the cryosphere by integrating diverse observations of sea ice physics, ecosystems, and food webs. As interest in collaborative research grows, co-production of knowledge (CPK) has emerged as a leading participatory approach in Arctic research. This study reviews multidisciplinary literature on sea ice knowledge co-production using a systematic literature review. Of more than 65 000 peer-reviewed articles on sea ice, only 461 mention engagement with Arctic Indigenous communities, and just 25 explicitly describe collaborative engagement with communities. By highlighting the presence and absence of key CPK tools and concepts in existing research, we uncover gaps in the documentation and practice of sharing research benefits with communities and identify opportunities for transparency in CPK practice.