Scholarlink

<p>This prospective study aimed to measure the absorbe dose received by the thyroid and lens using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) during treatment with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3-DCRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques for radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery (BCS + RT) and radiotherapy after mastectomy (PMRT) patients and also to examine the accuracy of treatment planning system (TPS) doses. Computed tomography images of 40 breast cancer patients were obtained. A significant difference was observed between the TPS and TLD doses of the right and left lenses (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). The mean thyroid dose measured in BCS + RT treatment was 598.0 and 1268.5&#xa0;cGy for 3DCRT and IMRT techniques, respectively. In PMRT treatment, this value was 579.3 and 1148.1&#xa0;cGy for 3DCRT and IMRT techniques, respectively. When evaluating the plans, the choice of treatment technique should be made taking into account that TPS data are incomplete.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Investigation of the effect of planning techniques on thyroid and lens absorbe doses in radiotherapy of left breast cancer by in vivo dosimetry: a prospective study

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月12日

查看全文
  • Osman Vefa Gul,
  • Hamit Basaran,
  • Mursel Duzova,
  • Cagdas Yavas

摘要

This prospective study aimed to measure the absorbe dose received by the thyroid and lens using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) during treatment with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3-DCRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques for radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery (BCS + RT) and radiotherapy after mastectomy (PMRT) patients and also to examine the accuracy of treatment planning system (TPS) doses. Computed tomography images of 40 breast cancer patients were obtained. A significant difference was observed between the TPS and TLD doses of the right and left lenses (p < 0.05). The mean thyroid dose measured in BCS + RT treatment was 598.0 and 1268.5 cGy for 3DCRT and IMRT techniques, respectively. In PMRT treatment, this value was 579.3 and 1148.1 cGy for 3DCRT and IMRT techniques, respectively. When evaluating the plans, the choice of treatment technique should be made taking into account that TPS data are incomplete.