Case-based learning (CBL) is widely used in undergraduate medical education, with demonstrable benefits for students across multiple domains. There is a paucity of data in the post-graduate setting. A robust training program is essential for specialty trainees in medical oncology, yet dedicated educational opportunities are limited by a busy clinical environment. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a post-graduate trainee-led CBL program within a Medical Oncology Department at a major cancer centre in Australia. All eligible participants (3 registrars, 1 clinical fellow, 2 nurse practitioners (NPs), 1 post-graduate student NP) were invited to attend weekly CBL sessions over a 20-week period. Session parameters, such as attendance and duration, were recorded. Feasibility was assessed using 4 of Bowen’s key areas: acceptability, demand, implementation and practicality. A questionnaire was completed by each participant following each session and on conclusion of the program. Researchers performed statistical analysis using Mann-Whitney U tests and conducted thematic analyses on qualitative data. Of 20 scheduled sessions, 14 (70%) ran without cancellation. Attendance rate was 66%, with most absences being attributed to leave. Mean session duration was 61.4 min, with mean preparation time of 24.2 min per participant. Participant perceived value was high (9.1/10) and significantly higher with faculty medical oncologist attendance (9.7 vs. 8.8, p = 0.001). Acceptability scores were excellent (9.4/10). CBL sessions were rated significantly higher than concurrent educational opportunities (9.1 vs. 8.1, p < 0.001). Coding of the qualitative data within participant surveys identified the following themes: CBL sessions (1) stimulated relevant and beneficial discussion, (2) were perceived positively, (3) were negatively affected by other clinical commitments, (4) were enhanced by the presence of a faculty medical oncologist, (5) generated a safe space for collaborative learning, (6) were time-efficient and (7) provided self-study opportunities. A postgraduate, trainee-led CBL program in medical oncology is feasible and was well received at our centre. It offers a promising complement to traditional teaching in a rapidly evolving field where faculty oncologist-led educational opportunities may be limited. Future studies could focus on the potential for virtual implementation to allow for collaboration between centres, to the benefit of rural medical oncology trainees.

Trainee-Led Case-Based Learning in Medical Oncology: A Feasibility Study

期刊论文
出版模式：

开放获取
发表日期：

2026年6月29日

查看全文

Jonathon Vundum,
Fiona Day

摘要

Case-based learning (CBL) is widely used in undergraduate medical education, with demonstrable benefits for students across multiple domains. There is a paucity of data in the post-graduate setting. A robust training program is essential for specialty trainees in medical oncology, yet dedicated educational opportunities are limited by a busy clinical environment. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a post-graduate trainee-led CBL program within a Medical Oncology Department at a major cancer centre in Australia. All eligible participants (3 registrars, 1 clinical fellow, 2 nurse practitioners (NPs), 1 post-graduate student NP) were invited to attend weekly CBL sessions over a 20-week period. Session parameters, such as attendance and duration, were recorded. Feasibility was assessed using 4 of Bowen’s key areas: acceptability, demand, implementation and practicality. A questionnaire was completed by each participant following each session and on conclusion of the program. Researchers performed statistical analysis using Mann-Whitney U tests and conducted thematic analyses on qualitative data. Of 20 scheduled sessions, 14 (70%) ran without cancellation. Attendance rate was 66%, with most absences being attributed to leave. Mean session duration was 61.4 min, with mean preparation time of 24.2 min per participant. Participant perceived value was high (9.1/10) and significantly higher with faculty medical oncologist attendance (9.7 vs. 8.8, p = 0.001). Acceptability scores were excellent (9.4/10). CBL sessions were rated significantly higher than concurrent educational opportunities (9.1 vs. 8.1, p < 0.001). Coding of the qualitative data within participant surveys identified the following themes: CBL sessions (1) stimulated relevant and beneficial discussion, (2) were perceived positively, (3) were negatively affected by other clinical commitments, (4) were enhanced by the presence of a faculty medical oncologist, (5) generated a safe space for collaborative learning, (6) were time-efficient and (7) provided self-study opportunities. A postgraduate, trainee-led CBL program in medical oncology is feasible and was well received at our centre. It offers a promising complement to traditional teaching in a rapidly evolving field where faculty oncologist-led educational opportunities may be limited. Future studies could focus on the potential for virtual implementation to allow for collaboration between centres, to the benefit of rural medical oncology trainees.