Scholarlink

<p>Use of integrative oncology (IO) has increased substantially, with a majority of cancer patients reporting use of integrative therapies alongside conventional treatment. Despite growing patient demand and expansion of integrative services at cancer centers, structured educational pathways for oncology providers remain limited. This national needs assessment evaluated interest in IO training and identified perceived barriers and priorities for curriculum development. An 18-question survey was distributed nationally to hematology/oncology, radiation oncology, and palliative care program directors, physicians, fellows, and internal medicine residents planning to enter these specialties. Programs were identified through the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). Surveys were sent electronically with informed consent and distributed weekly for two 4-week sessions. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize responses. A total of 208 eligible participants responded to survey. The majority (71.6%) considered IO valuable or essential, meanwhile expressing interest in formal education (64.2%) in IO education. Most respondents had little or no prior integrative medicine training (85.4%). Program directors endorsed the training at valuable (50%) or essential (13.3%). Key barriers included lack of curriculum, limited faculty expertise, inadequate funding, and time constraints. Participants preferred certificate programs (48%) or fellowship distinction tracks (44%) over a standalone IO fellowship. This national needs assessment demonstrates a national training gap and support the development of structured, scalable educational pathways in integrative oncology.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

A National Needs Assessment Identifies Training Gap in Integrative Oncology Education

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月9日

查看全文
  • Ashley Larsen,
  • John Camoriano,
  • Krisstina Gowin

摘要

Use of integrative oncology (IO) has increased substantially, with a majority of cancer patients reporting use of integrative therapies alongside conventional treatment. Despite growing patient demand and expansion of integrative services at cancer centers, structured educational pathways for oncology providers remain limited. This national needs assessment evaluated interest in IO training and identified perceived barriers and priorities for curriculum development. An 18-question survey was distributed nationally to hematology/oncology, radiation oncology, and palliative care program directors, physicians, fellows, and internal medicine residents planning to enter these specialties. Programs were identified through the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). Surveys were sent electronically with informed consent and distributed weekly for two 4-week sessions. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize responses. A total of 208 eligible participants responded to survey. The majority (71.6%) considered IO valuable or essential, meanwhile expressing interest in formal education (64.2%) in IO education. Most respondents had little or no prior integrative medicine training (85.4%). Program directors endorsed the training at valuable (50%) or essential (13.3%). Key barriers included lack of curriculum, limited faculty expertise, inadequate funding, and time constraints. Participants preferred certificate programs (48%) or fellowship distinction tracks (44%) over a standalone IO fellowship. This national needs assessment demonstrates a national training gap and support the development of structured, scalable educational pathways in integrative oncology.