Introduction <p>We look “behind the scenes” of LGBTQ research across seven countries from the perspective of researchers exploring the type of research undertaken, the challenges of conducting research in these settings, and the direction of future research. </p> Methods <p>Collaborators from the Global Pride pilot Study (from Argentina, Canada, India, Israel, New Zealand, Taiwan, and the UK) participated in an asynchronous roundtable in April, 2024, contributing word-limited written responses to the key areas above.</p> Results <p>Across nations, social sciences predominated with a focus on health and well-being and a marked recognition of diversity. There was a noted absence of national data across most countries, along with an absence of funding and other support with reference to varying cultural influences and heteronormativity. Addressing this diversity and inequalities were seen as future issues to consider, including issues of transgender and nonbinary experiences, housing, safety, and social connectedness, among others.</p> Conclusions <p>The roundtable is an effective forum for gathering and sharing individual-level research experiences within countries and a window onto the international state of the field.</p> Social-Policy Implications <p>Language (e.g., acronyms and terms) vary from country to country limiting both inclusion and comparison, with identified opportunities for curricular, programmatic and research innovation. </p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

LGBT Research Across Seven Countries: a Roundtable Discussion on Research Trends, Challenges, and Possibilities

  • Brian de Vries,
  • Rebecca L Jones,
  • Karen Fredriksen-Goldsen,
  • Kathryn Almack,
  • Ayelet Berg-Warman,
  • Robert Beringer,
  • Te-Sheng Chang,
  • Dau-Chuan Chung,
  • Sonja J. Ellis,
  • Raphael Eppler-Hattab,
  • Ricardo Iacub,
  • Andrew King,
  • Alexander MacDonald Haynes,
  • A Mani,
  • Yitschak Shnoor,
  • Tamara Vainscheinker

摘要

Introduction

We look “behind the scenes” of LGBTQ research across seven countries from the perspective of researchers exploring the type of research undertaken, the challenges of conducting research in these settings, and the direction of future research.

Methods

Collaborators from the Global Pride pilot Study (from Argentina, Canada, India, Israel, New Zealand, Taiwan, and the UK) participated in an asynchronous roundtable in April, 2024, contributing word-limited written responses to the key areas above.

Results

Across nations, social sciences predominated with a focus on health and well-being and a marked recognition of diversity. There was a noted absence of national data across most countries, along with an absence of funding and other support with reference to varying cultural influences and heteronormativity. Addressing this diversity and inequalities were seen as future issues to consider, including issues of transgender and nonbinary experiences, housing, safety, and social connectedness, among others.

Conclusions

The roundtable is an effective forum for gathering and sharing individual-level research experiences within countries and a window onto the international state of the field.

Social-Policy Implications

Language (e.g., acronyms and terms) vary from country to country limiting both inclusion and comparison, with identified opportunities for curricular, programmatic and research innovation.