Scholarlink

<p>This paper seeks to understand the knowledge dynamics of the bilateral R&amp;D project between Greek and Chinese researchers initiated in 2018. Our research involves a two-part empirical approach: first, we distributed a structured questionnaire to the researchers involved, and second, we examined bibliometric and technometric databases to independently verify their responses. Despite the collaborative nature of the project, findings reveal that publications resulting from this initiative were primarily authored by Greek or Chinese researchers alone, with minimal involvement from the collaborating partners. This trend is even more pronounced in technology outputs, where Chinese researchers filed patents independently. These important findings are contextualized within the debates on global science collaboration and the wider issues pertaining to geopolitical competitions and intentional and unwanted knowledge transfer. Lastly, we argue in favor of our method being employed in future evaluation and monitoring exercises.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Knowledge Dynamics in Scientific and Technological Collaboration: The Case of Greece and China

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年5月30日

查看全文
  • Nikolaos Karampekios,
  • Konstantinos Sioumalas-Christodoulou

摘要

This paper seeks to understand the knowledge dynamics of the bilateral R&D project between Greek and Chinese researchers initiated in 2018. Our research involves a two-part empirical approach: first, we distributed a structured questionnaire to the researchers involved, and second, we examined bibliometric and technometric databases to independently verify their responses. Despite the collaborative nature of the project, findings reveal that publications resulting from this initiative were primarily authored by Greek or Chinese researchers alone, with minimal involvement from the collaborating partners. This trend is even more pronounced in technology outputs, where Chinese researchers filed patents independently. These important findings are contextualized within the debates on global science collaboration and the wider issues pertaining to geopolitical competitions and intentional and unwanted knowledge transfer. Lastly, we argue in favor of our method being employed in future evaluation and monitoring exercises.