Scholarlink

<p>Performing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for heavily calcified coronary lesions remains a significant clinical challenge. In 2023, following the availability of intravascular lithotripsy (IVL), a consensus document was published outlining imaging-guided device selection strategies for the treatment of calcified lesions. Since the publication of that document, the DUAL-PREP study has demonstrated the safety of combining rotational atherectomy (rotablator) with IVL, a strategy previously contraindicated in the original consensus. As a result, a revision of the consensus document became necessary. In the updated consensus, the fundamental principle of imaging-guided treatment planning is retained. However, a key modification is the acknowledgment that IVL may now be considered in cases where post-atherectomy imaging reveals persistent heavy calcification and further atherectomy is deemed either ineffective or potentially harmful to the patient.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Device indication for calcified coronary lesions based on coronary imaging findings

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年8月22日

查看全文
  • Yuji Ikari,
  • Teruyasu Sugano,
  • Nobuhiko Ogata,
  • Shinjo Sonoda,
  • Kazuhiko Nakazato,
  • Junya Ako,
  • Toshiro Shinke,
  • Yoshio Kobayashi,
  • Ken Kozuma

摘要

Performing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for heavily calcified coronary lesions remains a significant clinical challenge. In 2023, following the availability of intravascular lithotripsy (IVL), a consensus document was published outlining imaging-guided device selection strategies for the treatment of calcified lesions. Since the publication of that document, the DUAL-PREP study has demonstrated the safety of combining rotational atherectomy (rotablator) with IVL, a strategy previously contraindicated in the original consensus. As a result, a revision of the consensus document became necessary. In the updated consensus, the fundamental principle of imaging-guided treatment planning is retained. However, a key modification is the acknowledgment that IVL may now be considered in cases where post-atherectomy imaging reveals persistent heavy calcification and further atherectomy is deemed either ineffective or potentially harmful to the patient.