Scholarlink

Purpose <p>Host factors, including genetic factors, are underutilized in breast cancer treatment selection. This study aimed to investigate <i>AIB1</i> genotypes as pharmacogenetic markers for adjuvant breast cancer treatment. The prognostic impact of three functional polymorphisms associated with altered mRNA expression rs6094752 (low expression), rs2230782 (low expression) and rs2076546 (high expression) was studied in different treatment groups.</p> Methods <p><i>AIB1</i> genotyping was performed using iPLEX™ on 576 breast cancer patients included 2002 − 2008 in Lund, Sweden, who were followed for up to 15 years. Clinicopathological data was obtained from questionnaires and patient charts. Diplotypes were constructed. Survival analyses were conducted with Kaplan-Meier curves, Log-Rank tests and multivariable Cox regression.</p> Results <p>The most common <i>AIB1</i> diplotypes were CGA_CGA (61.4%), CGA_CCA (16.4%), and CGA_CGG (12.0%). The remaining diplotypes were classified as ‘Rare’. Any breast cancer event was reported in 144 patients. There were significant interactions between radiotherapy and CGA_CGA (<i>P</i><sub>interaction</sub>=0.033) or CGA_CCA (<i>P</i><sub>interaction</sub>=0.017) on prognosis. In the 226 non-radiotherapy-treated patients, CGA_CGA carriers had the best prognosis, and CGA_CCA carriers the worst prognosis, with two-fold risk of breast cancer events in CGA_CCA compared with CGA_CGA carriers. In the 350 radiotherapy-treated patients, CGA_CGA was not associated with prognosis while CGA_CCA conferred 40% lower event risk. No other significant interactions between <i>AIB1</i> diplotypes and chemotherapy, tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors on prognosis were observed.</p> Conclusion <p><i>AIB1</i> genotypes conferred differential prognostic impact depending on adjuvant radiotherapy. If confirmed, <i>AIB1</i> merits further evaluation as a putative pharmacogenetic marker to identify patients that benefit the most from radiotherapy.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Interplay between AIB1 genotypes and radiotherapy in a Swedish population-based breast cancer cohort

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年1月3日

查看全文
  • Alexandra Wiberg,
  • Louise Ebbesen,
  • Christopher Godina,
  • Karolin Isaksson,
  • Helena Jernström

摘要

Purpose

Host factors, including genetic factors, are underutilized in breast cancer treatment selection. This study aimed to investigate AIB1 genotypes as pharmacogenetic markers for adjuvant breast cancer treatment. The prognostic impact of three functional polymorphisms associated with altered mRNA expression rs6094752 (low expression), rs2230782 (low expression) and rs2076546 (high expression) was studied in different treatment groups.

Methods

AIB1 genotyping was performed using iPLEX™ on 576 breast cancer patients included 2002 − 2008 in Lund, Sweden, who were followed for up to 15 years. Clinicopathological data was obtained from questionnaires and patient charts. Diplotypes were constructed. Survival analyses were conducted with Kaplan-Meier curves, Log-Rank tests and multivariable Cox regression.

Results

The most common AIB1 diplotypes were CGA_CGA (61.4%), CGA_CCA (16.4%), and CGA_CGG (12.0%). The remaining diplotypes were classified as ‘Rare’. Any breast cancer event was reported in 144 patients. There were significant interactions between radiotherapy and CGA_CGA (Pinteraction=0.033) or CGA_CCA (Pinteraction=0.017) on prognosis. In the 226 non-radiotherapy-treated patients, CGA_CGA carriers had the best prognosis, and CGA_CCA carriers the worst prognosis, with two-fold risk of breast cancer events in CGA_CCA compared with CGA_CGA carriers. In the 350 radiotherapy-treated patients, CGA_CGA was not associated with prognosis while CGA_CCA conferred 40% lower event risk. No other significant interactions between AIB1 diplotypes and chemotherapy, tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors on prognosis were observed.

Conclusion

AIB1 genotypes conferred differential prognostic impact depending on adjuvant radiotherapy. If confirmed, AIB1 merits further evaluation as a putative pharmacogenetic marker to identify patients that benefit the most from radiotherapy.