Background​ <p>The <i>DOK3</i> gene encodes an adaptor protein regulating immune receptor signaling and tumorigenesis, while its pan-cancer significance was poorly characterized. This research aimed to identify DOK3 as a predictive biomarker for predicting prognosis and immunotherapy outcomes in different malignancies.</p> ​Methods​ <p>Transcriptomic (TCGA/GTEx), proteomic (CPTAC), and clinical data from 33 cancer types were integrated for comprehensive analysis. The followings were included: (1) evaluation of DOK3 expression in association with patient survival through Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses; (2) assessment of genomic features, including tumor mutation burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI), homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), and copy number variations (CNVs); (3) characterization of the tumor immune microenvironment using CIBERSORT, TIMER2.0, and ESTIMATE; (4) investigation of epigenetic regulation via promoter methylation and RNA modification-related genes; (5) analysis of drug sensitivity through CellMiner data and molecular docking techniques; (6) In addition, functional assays were performed in breast cancer cell lines, including DOK3 knockdown and treatment with epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG).</p> Results​ <p><i>DOK3 expression</i> was upregulated in GBM and KIRC, while downregulated in BRCA and LIHC, exhibiting context-dependent prognostic implications—associated with poor survival in HNSC and SARC (HR &gt; 1.5, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), while favorable outcomes in KIRC and GBM. It demonstrated positive correlations with DNA repair genes (e.g., <i>MLH1</i> and <i>MSH2</i>) and tumor stemness scores, while inversely related to immune infiltration (ESTIMATE, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Promoter hypermethylation of <i>DOK3</i> was linked to the enhanced cytotoxic T lymphocyte activity (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Notably, <i>DOK3 expression</i> was correlated with M2 macrophage recruitment (<i>R</i> &gt; 0.4, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and immunosuppressive checkpoint markers (<i>CTLA4</i> and <i>TGFB1</i>). Drug screening prioritized epigallocatechin (binding energy: −9.1&#xa0;kcal/mol) and homochlorcyclizine (− 8.7&#xa0;kcal/mol) as potential <i>DOK3</i> inhibitors. Experimentally, DOK3 silencing reduced tumor cell viability, and EGCG treatment significantly suppressed DOK3 expression, supporting its potential as a therapeutic target.</p> ​Conclusion​ <p><i>DOK3</i> drives cancer progression via mechanisms, involving genomic instability and immune evasion, exhibiting dual prognostic roles depending on tumor context. Its immunosuppressive associations and druggable structure highlight <i>DOK3</i> as a promising target for precision immunotherapy.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Pan-cancer analysis identified DOK3 as a novel biomarker for predicting prognosis and immunotherapy effectiveness

  • Zichen Xu,
  • Lizhen Cai,
  • Qingkun Jiang,
  • Yuqi Xin,
  • Shaoqing Chen,
  • Jianwei Liu

摘要

Background​

The DOK3 gene encodes an adaptor protein regulating immune receptor signaling and tumorigenesis, while its pan-cancer significance was poorly characterized. This research aimed to identify DOK3 as a predictive biomarker for predicting prognosis and immunotherapy outcomes in different malignancies.

​Methods​

Transcriptomic (TCGA/GTEx), proteomic (CPTAC), and clinical data from 33 cancer types were integrated for comprehensive analysis. The followings were included: (1) evaluation of DOK3 expression in association with patient survival through Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses; (2) assessment of genomic features, including tumor mutation burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI), homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), and copy number variations (CNVs); (3) characterization of the tumor immune microenvironment using CIBERSORT, TIMER2.0, and ESTIMATE; (4) investigation of epigenetic regulation via promoter methylation and RNA modification-related genes; (5) analysis of drug sensitivity through CellMiner data and molecular docking techniques; (6) In addition, functional assays were performed in breast cancer cell lines, including DOK3 knockdown and treatment with epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG).

Results​

DOK3 expression was upregulated in GBM and KIRC, while downregulated in BRCA and LIHC, exhibiting context-dependent prognostic implications—associated with poor survival in HNSC and SARC (HR > 1.5, p < 0.01), while favorable outcomes in KIRC and GBM. It demonstrated positive correlations with DNA repair genes (e.g., MLH1 and MSH2) and tumor stemness scores, while inversely related to immune infiltration (ESTIMATE, p < 0.001). Promoter hypermethylation of DOK3 was linked to the enhanced cytotoxic T lymphocyte activity (p < 0.05). Notably, DOK3 expression was correlated with M2 macrophage recruitment (R > 0.4, p < 0.001) and immunosuppressive checkpoint markers (CTLA4 and TGFB1). Drug screening prioritized epigallocatechin (binding energy: −9.1 kcal/mol) and homochlorcyclizine (− 8.7 kcal/mol) as potential DOK3 inhibitors. Experimentally, DOK3 silencing reduced tumor cell viability, and EGCG treatment significantly suppressed DOK3 expression, supporting its potential as a therapeutic target.

​Conclusion​

DOK3 drives cancer progression via mechanisms, involving genomic instability and immune evasion, exhibiting dual prognostic roles depending on tumor context. Its immunosuppressive associations and druggable structure highlight DOK3 as a promising target for precision immunotherapy.