Scholarlink

Background <p>Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has been increasingly associated with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk in observational studies, yet the causal nature of this relationship and its impact on systemic lipid metabolism remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the bidirectional causal relationships between NAFLD and HCC, and their effects on lipid metabolomics profiles using Mendelian randomization.</p> Methods <p>We conducted comprehensive Mendelian randomization analyses using genetic variants as instrumental variables. For NAFLD exposure analysis, 6 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected, while 55 SNPs were used for HCC exposure in reverse analysis. Four statistical methods were employed: inverse variance weighted (IVW), MR Egger regression, weighted mode, and simple mode. The study evaluated causal effects on over 30 metabolic biomarkers, including triacylglycerols, phosphatidylcholines, phosphatidylinositols, ceramides, and sphingolipids. Comprehensive sensitivity analyses were performed to assess horizontal pleiotropy and result robustness.</p> Results <p>No statistically significant causal association was found between NAFLD and HCC risk across all four methods (MR Egger: OR 0.996, 95% CI 0.993–0.999, <i>P</i> = 0.088; IVW: OR 1.000, 95% CI 0.999–1.001, <i>P</i> = 0.969; weighted mode: OR 0.999, 95% CI 0.998–1.001, <i>P</i> = 0.447; simple mode: OR 1.001, 95% CI 0.999–1.002, <i>P</i> = 0.402). Reverse Mendelian randomization showed no significant causal effect of HCC on NAFLD development. Both NAFLD and HCC demonstrated limited direct causal effects on lipid metabolomics profiles, with confidence intervals for most metabolites clustering tightly around the null value (0.990–1.010). Only a few phospholipid compounds showed marginal significance in NAFLD analysis. Sensitivity analyses confirmed result robustness without evidence of horizontal pleiotropy.</p> Conclusions <p>This comprehensive Mendelian randomization study challenges the assumption of direct causal relationships between NAFLD, HCC, and systemic lipid metabolism.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Mendelian randomization analysis reveals no causal association between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma: implications for lipid metabolomics and shared pathophysiological mechanisms

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年9月29日

查看全文
  • Yingying Wei,
  • Junlian Li

摘要

Background

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has been increasingly associated with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk in observational studies, yet the causal nature of this relationship and its impact on systemic lipid metabolism remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the bidirectional causal relationships between NAFLD and HCC, and their effects on lipid metabolomics profiles using Mendelian randomization.

Methods

We conducted comprehensive Mendelian randomization analyses using genetic variants as instrumental variables. For NAFLD exposure analysis, 6 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected, while 55 SNPs were used for HCC exposure in reverse analysis. Four statistical methods were employed: inverse variance weighted (IVW), MR Egger regression, weighted mode, and simple mode. The study evaluated causal effects on over 30 metabolic biomarkers, including triacylglycerols, phosphatidylcholines, phosphatidylinositols, ceramides, and sphingolipids. Comprehensive sensitivity analyses were performed to assess horizontal pleiotropy and result robustness.

Results

No statistically significant causal association was found between NAFLD and HCC risk across all four methods (MR Egger: OR 0.996, 95% CI 0.993–0.999, P = 0.088; IVW: OR 1.000, 95% CI 0.999–1.001, P = 0.969; weighted mode: OR 0.999, 95% CI 0.998–1.001, P = 0.447; simple mode: OR 1.001, 95% CI 0.999–1.002, P = 0.402). Reverse Mendelian randomization showed no significant causal effect of HCC on NAFLD development. Both NAFLD and HCC demonstrated limited direct causal effects on lipid metabolomics profiles, with confidence intervals for most metabolites clustering tightly around the null value (0.990–1.010). Only a few phospholipid compounds showed marginal significance in NAFLD analysis. Sensitivity analyses confirmed result robustness without evidence of horizontal pleiotropy.

Conclusions

This comprehensive Mendelian randomization study challenges the assumption of direct causal relationships between NAFLD, HCC, and systemic lipid metabolism.