<p>The deformation behavior of austenitic stainless steels (ASSs) is strongly influenced by the transformation of austenite into martensite during loading. While most existing models of deformation-induced martensite primarily consider strain and temperature, they often neglect the influence of microstructural variables such as prior austenite grain size. In the present study, a quantitative relationship incorporating grain size and applied strain was developed to predict and optimize deformation-induced martensite formation in 304 stainless steel (SS 304). A face-centered central composite design (FCCD) based on the response surface methodology (RSM) was adopted to systematically evaluate the influence of grain size (10–30&#xa0;µm) and relative strain (40–80%) on the martensite transformation. The volume fraction of martensite (<InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({{\varvec{f}}}_{{\boldsymbol{\alpha }}^{\boldsymbol{^{\prime}}}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">f</mi> </mrow> <mmultiscripts> <mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">α</mi> </mrow> </mrow> <mrow /> <mrow> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mo mathvariant="bold">′</mo> </mmultiscripts> </mrow> </mmultiscripts> <mrow /> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) was quantified using X-ray diffraction&#xa0;and correlated with grain size and relative&#xa0;strain,while microstructural evolution during deformation was examined using scanning electron microscopy&#xa0;to understand the deformation mechanisms. A quadratic regression model was subsequently formulated and evaluated through analysis of variance, goodness of fit, and residual diagnostics, showing excellent agreement with experimental results (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.9905). The results reveal that grain size exhibits a nonlinear, non-monotonic effect, indicating an optimal transformation window.&#xa0;Optimization predicted an optimum condition of 18&#xa0;µm grain size and 50% strain, yielding <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(f_{{\alpha^{\prime}}} \approx 0.22\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>f</mi> <msup> <mi>α</mi> <mo>′</mo> </msup> </msub> <mo>≈</mo> <mn>0.22</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. The corresponding 95% prediction interval was 0.17–0.26, within which the experimentally measured value 0.23 ± 0.01 lies, confirming the predictive accuracy of the developed model.</p> Graphical Abstract <p></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Response Surface Modeling of Deformation-Induced Martensite in 304 Stainless Steel

  • Ashish Jain,
  • Priya Tiwari,
  • Abhinav Varshney

摘要

The deformation behavior of austenitic stainless steels (ASSs) is strongly influenced by the transformation of austenite into martensite during loading. While most existing models of deformation-induced martensite primarily consider strain and temperature, they often neglect the influence of microstructural variables such as prior austenite grain size. In the present study, a quantitative relationship incorporating grain size and applied strain was developed to predict and optimize deformation-induced martensite formation in 304 stainless steel (SS 304). A face-centered central composite design (FCCD) based on the response surface methodology (RSM) was adopted to systematically evaluate the influence of grain size (10–30 µm) and relative strain (40–80%) on the martensite transformation. The volume fraction of martensite ( \({{\varvec{f}}}_{{\boldsymbol{\alpha }}^{\boldsymbol{^{\prime}}}}\) f α ) was quantified using X-ray diffraction and correlated with grain size and relative strain,while microstructural evolution during deformation was examined using scanning electron microscopy to understand the deformation mechanisms. A quadratic regression model was subsequently formulated and evaluated through analysis of variance, goodness of fit, and residual diagnostics, showing excellent agreement with experimental results (R2 = 0.9905). The results reveal that grain size exhibits a nonlinear, non-monotonic effect, indicating an optimal transformation window. Optimization predicted an optimum condition of 18 µm grain size and 50% strain, yielding \(f_{{\alpha^{\prime}}} \approx 0.22\) f α 0.22 . The corresponding 95% prediction interval was 0.17–0.26, within which the experimentally measured value 0.23 ± 0.01 lies, confirming the predictive accuracy of the developed model.

Graphical Abstract