A Comparative Study of Composite Versus Double Flap Technique for Repair of Traumatic Split Earlobes

Ear piercing is a common practice in all over the world and can result in complications such as torn or cleft earlobes. This study aimed to compare two surgical modalities for correction of earlobe splits; the Composite Closure technique and Double flap technique in terms of aesthetic results, preservation of original orifice, and prevention of relapse. It also assessed the possible superiority of one technique over another.

12 patients aged 25–61 years were randomly selected and treated with Composite Closure Technique (Group A) or Double Flap Technique (Group B) under local anesthesia. Clinical evaluation was done post operatively on 14th and 90th days.

All patients had good post-operative outcomes, with preserved ear lobe thickness and minimal scar in both the methods. Data was entered in Microsoft Excel Sheet format and subjected to statistical analysis using SPSS Version 23. Comparisons were made using statistical tests to determine statistical significance.

Both the techniques offered good post operative results. The need for re piercing was avoided and proved to be well accepted by the patients.