错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The Influence of Implant Number on Stress Distribution in the Anterior Region of Mandible Reconstructed with Fibula Bone Graft: A Finite Element Analysis

  • Fatemeh Latifi,
  • Reza Tabrizi,
  • Mohammadreza Hosseini Kordkheili,
  • Soheil Shahbazi,
  • Gustavo Vicentis Oliveira Fernandes

摘要

Objective

The goal of this study was to compare the stress distribution of three or four implants in the anterior region of the mandible that was grafted with a free vascularized fibula flap.

Methods

Two three-dimensional finite element models were designed based on cone-beam computed tomography of a patient whose anterior region of the mandible was restored with a free vascularized fibula flap. In both three- (G1) and four-implant (G2) models, the fixtures were connected with a fixed suprastructure. Occlusal loads were simulated using 300N.cm vertical and 50 N cm oblique forces. Implant micromotion and von Mises stress (VMS) distribution were measured. Inter-model comparisons were performed.

Results

Regarding vertical forces for G1 and G2, the supporting bone volume at maximum VMS was 2.44 mm3 and 3.04 mm3; the fixture volume undergoing maximum VMS was 160 mm3 and 175 mm3. For oblique forces, in the G1 and G2, respectively, the maximum VMS resulted in 7.09 mm3 and 7.73 mm3, and the fixture volume was 7.23 mm3 and 1.56 mm3. In G1, the most distal and middle implants showed the highest and lowest displacement; whereas in G2, the most distal implant displaced under vertical forces, showing the least micromotion under oblique loads. The inter-model comparison showed G2 had lower micromotion on average.

Conclusion

Employing the three-implant concept in rehabilitating the anterior region of a fibula-reconstructed mandible resulted in less VMS concentration under vertical and oblique forces; however, using four implants would be better for minimizing the fixture displacement. It is suggested new studies compare new scenarios matching different types of bone grafts and dental implants placed in the mandible and maxilla, trying to keep the heterogeneous complexity of the biomaterials to have better mimics and reality, increasing the reliability of the study.