Are artefacts misleading the diagnosis of Ascaris lumbricoides in microscopy? Observations

Stool has multiple components, which include undigested food material, plant, animal products, normal intestinal microbiome, and parasites. Due to the existence of all the elements, stool parasite examination is cumbersome, especially with identification of the eggs of Ascaris lumbricoides. We examined 650 stool samples of pregnant women before anti-helminthic treatment. We found that the prevalence of Ascaris lumbricoides was 5.4% (95% CI 3.8–7.4, n = 35) by a single observer in microscopy, and the majority (33/35) were identified as decorticated fertilized eggs. The prevalence of Ascaris by molecular methods was 2.6% (95% CI 1.5–4.2%, n = 17). Five samples were positive by both methods. The prevalence of structures resembling Ascaris was 4.6% (95% CI 3.1–6.5, n = 30). Three of the positive samples were confirmed with sequencing. With the subjective nature of microscopy along with the naked eye examination, errors can happen. Hence adequate training and confirmation with molecular techniques for identification of Ascaris lumbricoides are advisable.