<p>Organizations collect growing volumes of data to extract value through analytics. However, this data growth creates challenges for effective data understanding, which forms the foundation for reliable decision-making and effective AI systems. Established analytics frameworks such as CRISP-DM and KDD acknowledge this importance but provide limited guidance to achieve this understanding, particularly for data-centric AI requiring collaboration across stakeholder groups. To address this gap, the authors conducted a systematic literature review, developing a five-dimensional framework for data understanding. They then performed a systematic mapping study analyzing how existing methods support these dimensions and accommodate different target audiences. The analysis reveals critical gaps in current methods, particularly in systematically supporting the understanding of data collection and contextualization. While most methods target data experts, the authors find a notable lack of methods supporting domain experts and decision-makers. This research advances both theoretical understanding by identifying the key dimensions that constitute data understanding and practical implementation by providing organizations with guidance on building data understanding.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Data Understanding for Data-Centric AI

  • Joshua Holstein,
  • Philipp Spitzer,
  • Samuel Gensch,
  • Marieke Hoell,
  • Michael Vössing,
  • Niklas Kühl

摘要

Organizations collect growing volumes of data to extract value through analytics. However, this data growth creates challenges for effective data understanding, which forms the foundation for reliable decision-making and effective AI systems. Established analytics frameworks such as CRISP-DM and KDD acknowledge this importance but provide limited guidance to achieve this understanding, particularly for data-centric AI requiring collaboration across stakeholder groups. To address this gap, the authors conducted a systematic literature review, developing a five-dimensional framework for data understanding. They then performed a systematic mapping study analyzing how existing methods support these dimensions and accommodate different target audiences. The analysis reveals critical gaps in current methods, particularly in systematically supporting the understanding of data collection and contextualization. While most methods target data experts, the authors find a notable lack of methods supporting domain experts and decision-makers. This research advances both theoretical understanding by identifying the key dimensions that constitute data understanding and practical implementation by providing organizations with guidance on building data understanding.