Scholarlink

<p>In the modern era of global competition, supply chain management (SCM) cannot be limited to economic efficiency alone. Environmental sustainability and social responsibility must now be included. In this context, this study evaluates eight key SCM practices; Agile SCM, Lean Manufacturing, Vendor-Managed Inventory, Efficient Consumer Response, Just-in-Time, Demand-Driven SCM, Sustainable SCM, and Cross-Docking. The analysis was based on a rich data set covering economic, environmental, and social parameters. This study compares the results obtained using weight assignment techniques Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) with other Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method. Additionally, the best suppliers have been compared through supplier ranking methods such as the Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment of Evaluations (PROMETHEE), elimination and choice translating reality (ELECTRE), Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) and Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS). In addition, the study compared the Pareto frontier obtained from the proposed multi-objective linear programming (MOLP) model by integrating the Epsilon Constraint and Weighted Sum Methods. Based on these methods, cross-docking and sustainable SCM were found to be the best-performing options, whereas vendor-managed inventory proved to be comparatively less effective. Sensitivity analysis is used to evaluate robustness of the model. This study provides concrete guidance for policymakers to adopt sustainable, flexible, and effective SCM strategies.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Comparative evaluation of sustainable supply chain practices with an application of real-world datasets through hybrid MCDM and optimization approaches

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月18日

查看全文
  • Anshu Abhilasha,
  • Faizan Danish

摘要

In the modern era of global competition, supply chain management (SCM) cannot be limited to economic efficiency alone. Environmental sustainability and social responsibility must now be included. In this context, this study evaluates eight key SCM practices; Agile SCM, Lean Manufacturing, Vendor-Managed Inventory, Efficient Consumer Response, Just-in-Time, Demand-Driven SCM, Sustainable SCM, and Cross-Docking. The analysis was based on a rich data set covering economic, environmental, and social parameters. This study compares the results obtained using weight assignment techniques Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) with other Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method. Additionally, the best suppliers have been compared through supplier ranking methods such as the Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment of Evaluations (PROMETHEE), elimination and choice translating reality (ELECTRE), Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) and Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS). In addition, the study compared the Pareto frontier obtained from the proposed multi-objective linear programming (MOLP) model by integrating the Epsilon Constraint and Weighted Sum Methods. Based on these methods, cross-docking and sustainable SCM were found to be the best-performing options, whereas vendor-managed inventory proved to be comparatively less effective. Sensitivity analysis is used to evaluate robustness of the model. This study provides concrete guidance for policymakers to adopt sustainable, flexible, and effective SCM strategies.