Scholarlink

<p>Rake-legged mites (Caeculidae) are ambush predators. The fossil record of the group Caeculidae is scarce, but includes a few well-preserved specimens in Miocene, Eocene and Cretaceous ambers. We report newly discovered specimens from approximately 100-million-year-old Kachin amber in Myanmar. The specimens possess the typical raptorial forelegs bearing spine-like setae with extended sockets. One of the new specimens, and possibly also another one, represents a six-legged larva, the first larva of Caeculidae known for Kachin amber, and seemingly for the entire fossil record of the group. A quantitative morphological analysis reveals that most fossils share similar morphologies with modern species. Extant specimens occupied a larger morphospace, indicating a possible recent diversification of the lineage. However, it could be explained by a sampling bias since fossils of Caeculidae are still rare. Only one of the new fossil specimens differs from the modern forms in morphology, which points to a possible different ecology.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Quantitative morphological comparison of rake-legged mites over the last 100 million years and the first fossil larva of Caeculidae

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年5月27日

查看全文
  • Alexis Gerbe,
  • Carolin Haug,
  • Florian Braig,
  • Patrick Müller,
  • Joachim T. Haug,
  • Andrés O. Porta,
  • Sofía I. Arce

摘要

Rake-legged mites (Caeculidae) are ambush predators. The fossil record of the group Caeculidae is scarce, but includes a few well-preserved specimens in Miocene, Eocene and Cretaceous ambers. We report newly discovered specimens from approximately 100-million-year-old Kachin amber in Myanmar. The specimens possess the typical raptorial forelegs bearing spine-like setae with extended sockets. One of the new specimens, and possibly also another one, represents a six-legged larva, the first larva of Caeculidae known for Kachin amber, and seemingly for the entire fossil record of the group. A quantitative morphological analysis reveals that most fossils share similar morphologies with modern species. Extant specimens occupied a larger morphospace, indicating a possible recent diversification of the lineage. However, it could be explained by a sampling bias since fossils of Caeculidae are still rare. Only one of the new fossil specimens differs from the modern forms in morphology, which points to a possible different ecology.