Scholarlink

Background <p>The rising prevalence of atrial fibrillation has led to increasing the numbers of pulmonary vein isolations. Optimising care pathway efficiency is essential for sustainable healthcare delivery. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of closure devices (CD) within the care pathway on hospital stay, patient satisfaction, staff workload, and costs, following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.</p> Methods <p>This study compared the standard care pathway following catheter ablation using manual compression (MC, December 2023–February 2024) to a&#xa0;modified pathway incorporating suture-mediated CD (March-May 2024). Primary outcomes included process indicators (e.g., hospitalisation duration), clinical outcomes (e.g., bleeding complications), and patient experience. Secondary outcomes included staff experience and healthcare costs associated with procedural changes.</p> Results <p>A&#xa0;total of 159 patients participated (MC: 81&#xa0;patients, CD: 78&#xa0;patients). Patients received an average of 2&#xa0;percutaneous sutures. Treatment with CDs resulted in a&#xa0;3.7-hour reduction in hospitalisation duration (<i>p</i> &lt;. 001), 10-minute shorter procedure time in first-time ablations (<i>p</i> = .006), and 4‑hour shorter bed rest (<i>p</i> &lt;. 001). Patients experienced less pain, measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (median&#xa0;3 vs&#xa0;1, <i>p</i> = .001), and used less pain medication (<i>p</i> = .006). Discharge comfort was higher in the CD group (<i>p</i> = .009), while complication rates remained similar. 24&#xa0;nurses participated in the questionnaire. Most nurses reported improved time efficiency and workday organisation. Costs were similar across groups.</p> Conclusion <p>CDs improve care pathways after atrial fibrillation ablation by reducing hospitalisation time, enhancing patient comfort, and improving workflow efficiency without increasing complications.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Optimising the atrial fibrillation ablation pathway using vascular closure devices: effects on length of stay, procedure time and outcomes

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月3日

查看全文
  • Miriam A. Scheurwater,
  • Bianca de Louw,
  • Dennis van Veghel,
  • Daniela N. Schulz,
  • Alexandre J. Ouss,
  • Rolf P. J. de Bruin,
  • Lukas R. C. Dekker

摘要

Background

The rising prevalence of atrial fibrillation has led to increasing the numbers of pulmonary vein isolations. Optimising care pathway efficiency is essential for sustainable healthcare delivery. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of closure devices (CD) within the care pathway on hospital stay, patient satisfaction, staff workload, and costs, following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Methods

This study compared the standard care pathway following catheter ablation using manual compression (MC, December 2023–February 2024) to a modified pathway incorporating suture-mediated CD (March-May 2024). Primary outcomes included process indicators (e.g., hospitalisation duration), clinical outcomes (e.g., bleeding complications), and patient experience. Secondary outcomes included staff experience and healthcare costs associated with procedural changes.

Results

A total of 159 patients participated (MC: 81 patients, CD: 78 patients). Patients received an average of 2 percutaneous sutures. Treatment with CDs resulted in a 3.7-hour reduction in hospitalisation duration (p <. 001), 10-minute shorter procedure time in first-time ablations (p = .006), and 4‑hour shorter bed rest (p <. 001). Patients experienced less pain, measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (median 3 vs 1, p = .001), and used less pain medication (p = .006). Discharge comfort was higher in the CD group (p = .009), while complication rates remained similar. 24 nurses participated in the questionnaire. Most nurses reported improved time efficiency and workday organisation. Costs were similar across groups.

Conclusion

CDs improve care pathways after atrial fibrillation ablation by reducing hospitalisation time, enhancing patient comfort, and improving workflow efficiency without increasing complications.