<p>Waste products recycling and its mechanism design are receiving increasing attention. This paper focuses on the examination of a closed-loop supply chain, including a manufacturer, a retailer and a third-party, while also exploring the impacts of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and government subsidy on all participants and the waste products recycling mechanism design. Three Stackelberg game models are established to solve the optimal decision-making problem: recycling model without considering CSR and government subsidy (DA), recycling model with considering manufacturer’s CSR (DB), and recycling model with considering manufacturer’s CSR and government subsidy (DC). The study shows that, there exists the sharing ratio on the interval from 0 to 0.5 that can maximize the supply chain’s profit under DA model. While considering manufacturer’s goal of pursuing social welfare (DB, DC), it is essential to ensure the sharing ratio on the interval from zero and two-thirds to maximize the overall profit. Whichever model, larger sharing ratio will result in lower recycling rate. The retailer and third-party tend to expect manufacturer to have certain awareness of CSR, as well as certain government subsidy to maximize their respective profits. Lastly, numerical analysis is employed in this paper to confirm the derived conclusions.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Waste products recycling mechanism design considering CSR and government subsidy

  • Guoli Wang,
  • Boxiao Hua,
  • Junyan Wang

摘要

Waste products recycling and its mechanism design are receiving increasing attention. This paper focuses on the examination of a closed-loop supply chain, including a manufacturer, a retailer and a third-party, while also exploring the impacts of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and government subsidy on all participants and the waste products recycling mechanism design. Three Stackelberg game models are established to solve the optimal decision-making problem: recycling model without considering CSR and government subsidy (DA), recycling model with considering manufacturer’s CSR (DB), and recycling model with considering manufacturer’s CSR and government subsidy (DC). The study shows that, there exists the sharing ratio on the interval from 0 to 0.5 that can maximize the supply chain’s profit under DA model. While considering manufacturer’s goal of pursuing social welfare (DB, DC), it is essential to ensure the sharing ratio on the interval from zero and two-thirds to maximize the overall profit. Whichever model, larger sharing ratio will result in lower recycling rate. The retailer and third-party tend to expect manufacturer to have certain awareness of CSR, as well as certain government subsidy to maximize their respective profits. Lastly, numerical analysis is employed in this paper to confirm the derived conclusions.