Scholarlink

<p>Empathy can be categorized into positive and negative empathy depending on the emotional valence experienced. When responding to others’ emotions, empathy involves three key subprocesses: emotion recognition, affective empathy, and motivational empathy. However, how these subprocesses operate to realistic positive <i>versus</i> negative stimuli remains largely unexplored. To fill this gap, we selected 96 real-life events with detailed contextual information and collected functional magnetic resonance imaging data. We observed lower within-subject and between-subject behavioral and neural similarity for positive empathy than for negative empathy. Although positive and negative empathy partially shared neural mechanisms underlying emotion recognition—evident in overlapping encoding regions and functional connectivity (FC)—they diverged notably in affective and motivational empathy. Negative empathy involved more complex encoding schemes and more convergent FC than positive empathy. These findings deepen our understanding of empathy dynamics, highlighting its multifaceted nature and the importance of distinguishing between positive and negative emotions in empathy research.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Exploring Empathic Responses to Others’ Positive and Negative Experiences: Insights from Empathy Subprocesses

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年10月25日

查看全文
  • Xiao Wu,
  • Xue-Jing Lu,
  • Li-Bo Zhang,
  • Si-Rui Huo,
  • Ya-Zhuo Kong,
  • Li Hu

摘要

Empathy can be categorized into positive and negative empathy depending on the emotional valence experienced. When responding to others’ emotions, empathy involves three key subprocesses: emotion recognition, affective empathy, and motivational empathy. However, how these subprocesses operate to realistic positive versus negative stimuli remains largely unexplored. To fill this gap, we selected 96 real-life events with detailed contextual information and collected functional magnetic resonance imaging data. We observed lower within-subject and between-subject behavioral and neural similarity for positive empathy than for negative empathy. Although positive and negative empathy partially shared neural mechanisms underlying emotion recognition—evident in overlapping encoding regions and functional connectivity (FC)—they diverged notably in affective and motivational empathy. Negative empathy involved more complex encoding schemes and more convergent FC than positive empathy. These findings deepen our understanding of empathy dynamics, highlighting its multifaceted nature and the importance of distinguishing between positive and negative emotions in empathy research.