Purpose <p>The purpose of the current research work was to develop controlled-release tablets of lornoxicam using polymers Carbopol<sup>®</sup> 934 and Ethocel<sup>®</sup> grade 7.</p> Methods <p>They were prepared by the direct compression method. The formulation mixture was analyzed by using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). They were evaluated for weight uniformity, friability, thickness, breaking force, diameter, and dissolution. Drug release patterns incorporated numerous kinetic models. The optimized tablets (F5) and reference tablets were given to healthy male rabbits, F5 to group I and reference to group II. The drug and ingredients were compatible using DSC and FTIR.</p> Results <p>Physical characteristics met the USP ranges. In the dissolution study, the drug profile was extended over 24 h. The F5 pharmacokinetic parameters were Cmax, Tmax, AUCo-24, AUCo-∞, T1/2, and Cl, which were 1316 ± 0.16 (µg/mL), 6.8 ± 0.26 (h), 5016 ± 0.32 (µg/mL), 7345 ± 0.16 (µg.h/mL), 11.64 ± 0.28 (h), and 0.021 ± 0.36 (mL/min), respectively. The reference tablets’ Cmax, Tmax, AUCo-24, AUCo-∞, T1/2, and Cl were 1299 ± 0.41 (µg/mL), 1.9 ± 0.28 (h), 4985 ± 0.25 (µg/mL), 6981 ± 0.06 (µg.h/mL), 3.98 ± 0.32 (h), and 0.023 ± 0.13 (mL/min), respectively.</p> Conclusion <p>It is concluded from this research work that controlled-release tablets might reduce dosing frequency and improve patient compliance and therapeutic outcomes.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Formulation and In-vitro and In-vivo Evaluation of Lornoxicam Controlled-Release Tablets Using Different Rate-Controlling Agents

  • Fahad Y. Sabei,
  • Awaji Y. Safhi,
  • Ahmad Salawi,
  • Abdullah Alsalhi,
  • Kamran Ahmad Khan,
  • Osama A. Madkhali,
  • Ali Hanbashi,
  • Ahmed H. Albariqi,
  • Mohammed Ail Bakkari,
  • Hassan A. Albarqi

摘要

Purpose

The purpose of the current research work was to develop controlled-release tablets of lornoxicam using polymers Carbopol® 934 and Ethocel® grade 7.

Methods

They were prepared by the direct compression method. The formulation mixture was analyzed by using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). They were evaluated for weight uniformity, friability, thickness, breaking force, diameter, and dissolution. Drug release patterns incorporated numerous kinetic models. The optimized tablets (F5) and reference tablets were given to healthy male rabbits, F5 to group I and reference to group II. The drug and ingredients were compatible using DSC and FTIR.

Results

Physical characteristics met the USP ranges. In the dissolution study, the drug profile was extended over 24 h. The F5 pharmacokinetic parameters were Cmax, Tmax, AUCo-24, AUCo-∞, T1/2, and Cl, which were 1316 ± 0.16 (µg/mL), 6.8 ± 0.26 (h), 5016 ± 0.32 (µg/mL), 7345 ± 0.16 (µg.h/mL), 11.64 ± 0.28 (h), and 0.021 ± 0.36 (mL/min), respectively. The reference tablets’ Cmax, Tmax, AUCo-24, AUCo-∞, T1/2, and Cl were 1299 ± 0.41 (µg/mL), 1.9 ± 0.28 (h), 4985 ± 0.25 (µg/mL), 6981 ± 0.06 (µg.h/mL), 3.98 ± 0.32 (h), and 0.023 ± 0.13 (mL/min), respectively.

Conclusion

It is concluded from this research work that controlled-release tablets might reduce dosing frequency and improve patient compliance and therapeutic outcomes.