<p>Low-level vibration exposures are known to affect multiple tissues in living organisms. This study investigates the effects of vibration exposure on bone tissue in larval zebrafish (<i>Danio rerio</i>). Larvae were exposed to vibrations (44–50&#xa0;Hz) for 24&#xa0;h, with or without anaesthesia, and were compared to controls. Ossification levels of the larval skeleton together with the expression of <i>colX</i> (a marker of bone development) in the operculum bone was used to determine the morphological response to vibrations. Gene expression of bone-related (<i>acp5a</i>,<i> bglap</i>,<i> rankl</i>) and apoptosis-related markers (<i>bax</i>) was then evaluated via RT-qPCR after the 24-hour exposure as well as one week after treatment. Results showed no significant differences in overall ossification or <i>colX</i> expression due to vibration. However, gene expression analyses revealed transient changes: all genes were affected immediately after vibration in contrast to one week later, when only <i>acp5a</i> and <i>bglap</i> were affected. These findings suggest that while short-term low-frequency vibration does not visibly affect bone morphology, it can influence bone homeostasis at the molecular level. Our study also underscores the need for appropriate vibration controls in ground-based simulated microgravity studies in order to assess the impact of vibrations from equipment used (e.g. incubators, or other platforms), particularly in gene expression experiments.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Differential Effects of Vibration on Bone Tissue in Zebrafish

  • Juan D. Carvajal-Agudelo,
  • Tamara A. Franz-Odendaal

摘要

Low-level vibration exposures are known to affect multiple tissues in living organisms. This study investigates the effects of vibration exposure on bone tissue in larval zebrafish (Danio rerio). Larvae were exposed to vibrations (44–50 Hz) for 24 h, with or without anaesthesia, and were compared to controls. Ossification levels of the larval skeleton together with the expression of colX (a marker of bone development) in the operculum bone was used to determine the morphological response to vibrations. Gene expression of bone-related (acp5a, bglap, rankl) and apoptosis-related markers (bax) was then evaluated via RT-qPCR after the 24-hour exposure as well as one week after treatment. Results showed no significant differences in overall ossification or colX expression due to vibration. However, gene expression analyses revealed transient changes: all genes were affected immediately after vibration in contrast to one week later, when only acp5a and bglap were affected. These findings suggest that while short-term low-frequency vibration does not visibly affect bone morphology, it can influence bone homeostasis at the molecular level. Our study also underscores the need for appropriate vibration controls in ground-based simulated microgravity studies in order to assess the impact of vibrations from equipment used (e.g. incubators, or other platforms), particularly in gene expression experiments.