Scholarlink

<p>The field of psychological injury and law involves forensic assessments of disability and related referral questions. This article examines ethics for practice and court in forensic disability and related assessments (FDRA). Specifically, it examines ethical statements published in the psychological field. In addition, it examines multiple testing issues from an ethics point of view. It discusses cognitive biases that affect FDRA practice, but debiasing techniques, as well. The article examines an ethics practice guideline as applied to malingering. It emphasizes dealing appropriately with issues of language and racial/minority/cultural differences in FDRA. On topics concerning court, the article examines major court decisions and rules of evidence that govern practice in FDRA. The article presents legal decisions related to court, including the Supreme Court of the United States decision <i>Daubert</i>, the <i>Daubert</i> trilogy, and legal decisions that address malingering. It discusses causality in forensic disability and related assessment cases. In the end, the article presents ways of functioning effectively dealing with referrals related to psychological injury and law in adjunct topics beyond those involving effective assessment.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Invalid Response Set, Malingering, and Related Assessments in Psychological Injury: Ethics, Causality, and Court

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年1月31日

查看全文
  • Gerald Young,
  • Luciano Giromini,
  • Laszlo Erdodi,
  • Eric Drogin,
  • Richard Rogers

摘要

The field of psychological injury and law involves forensic assessments of disability and related referral questions. This article examines ethics for practice and court in forensic disability and related assessments (FDRA). Specifically, it examines ethical statements published in the psychological field. In addition, it examines multiple testing issues from an ethics point of view. It discusses cognitive biases that affect FDRA practice, but debiasing techniques, as well. The article examines an ethics practice guideline as applied to malingering. It emphasizes dealing appropriately with issues of language and racial/minority/cultural differences in FDRA. On topics concerning court, the article examines major court decisions and rules of evidence that govern practice in FDRA. The article presents legal decisions related to court, including the Supreme Court of the United States decision Daubert, the Daubert trilogy, and legal decisions that address malingering. It discusses causality in forensic disability and related assessment cases. In the end, the article presents ways of functioning effectively dealing with referrals related to psychological injury and law in adjunct topics beyond those involving effective assessment.