Scholarlink

<p>The purpose of this study is to clarify the influence of acquiring medical record information and laboratory data on the sensitivity of detecting imaging findings among Japanese radiological technologists (RTs). RTs were presented with patient’s&#xa0;information in three distinct sequences for detecting imaging findings. True positives (TP) were identified and categorized into three groups: Group 1 (image + chief complaint), Group 2 (image + chief complaint + medical record), and Group 3 (image + chief complaint + medical record + laboratory data). Compared with Group 1, Groups 2 and 3 exhibited up to 8.3% and 16.7% higher sensitivity, respectively. Notably, Group 3 demonstrated up to 13.3% higher sensitivity than that of Group 2. Obtaining medical record information and laboratory data improved the sensitivity of imaging findings detected by RTs. This study provides valuable insights for optimizing diagnostic protocols and improving patient outcomes by leveraging supplementary clinical data to augment diagnostic accuracy.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Influence of obtaining medical records and laboratory data on the sensitivity of diagnostic imaging assessment by radiological technologists

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年1月16日

查看全文
  • Norikazu Koori,
  • Takahide Kato,
  • Shohei Yamamoto,
  • Mayumi Yasui,
  • Kazuma Kurata,
  • Takeshi Hasegawa,
  • Fuminari Nishikawa,
  • Masami Sugiyama,
  • Reina Ishiguro,
  • Yohei Takamatsu,
  • Maho Higuchi,
  • Hiroki Kobayashi,
  • Hiroki Nakane,
  • Hiraku Fuse,
  • Kota Sasaki,
  • Shin Miyakawa,
  • Kenji Yasue,
  • Masato Takahashi,
  • Naoki Nosaka

摘要

The purpose of this study is to clarify the influence of acquiring medical record information and laboratory data on the sensitivity of detecting imaging findings among Japanese radiological technologists (RTs). RTs were presented with patient’s information in three distinct sequences for detecting imaging findings. True positives (TP) were identified and categorized into three groups: Group 1 (image + chief complaint), Group 2 (image + chief complaint + medical record), and Group 3 (image + chief complaint + medical record + laboratory data). Compared with Group 1, Groups 2 and 3 exhibited up to 8.3% and 16.7% higher sensitivity, respectively. Notably, Group 3 demonstrated up to 13.3% higher sensitivity than that of Group 2. Obtaining medical record information and laboratory data improved the sensitivity of imaging findings detected by RTs. This study provides valuable insights for optimizing diagnostic protocols and improving patient outcomes by leveraging supplementary clinical data to augment diagnostic accuracy.