Objective <p>The Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) is used to predict the prognosis of several cancers. This first systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the role of GPS in predicting overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with hematological malignancies.</p> Methods <p>Embase, PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Google Scholar were screened for studies evaluating the prognostic role of GPS in hematological malignancies.</p> Results <p>Twelve studies were eligible. Meta-analysis showed that patients with GPS of ≥1 and ≥2 had worse OS than those with GPS of 0. We noted that both GPS scores of ≥1 and ≥2 were associated with significantly poor PFS in patients with hematological malignancies. Results remained robust on sensitivity analysis.</p> Conclusion <p>GPS can be used as a predictor of OS and PFS in patients with hematological malignancies. High GPS scores can lead to a twofold higher risk of poor OS and PFS.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Prognostic value of Glasgow prognostic score in hematological malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Lijun Jiang,
  • Wenting Jin

摘要

Objective

The Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) is used to predict the prognosis of several cancers. This first systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the role of GPS in predicting overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with hematological malignancies.

Methods

Embase, PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Google Scholar were screened for studies evaluating the prognostic role of GPS in hematological malignancies.

Results

Twelve studies were eligible. Meta-analysis showed that patients with GPS of ≥1 and ≥2 had worse OS than those with GPS of 0. We noted that both GPS scores of ≥1 and ≥2 were associated with significantly poor PFS in patients with hematological malignancies. Results remained robust on sensitivity analysis.

Conclusion

GPS can be used as a predictor of OS and PFS in patients with hematological malignancies. High GPS scores can lead to a twofold higher risk of poor OS and PFS.