Scholarlink

Purpose of Review <p>Examine how language barriers impact musculoskeletal care in the United States, particularly for patients with non-English language preference (NELP), and to highlight strategies to improve equity in orthopaedic outcomes.</p> Recent Findings <p>In the U.S., 24.5&#xa0;million individuals have NELP, yet few orthopaedic surgeons are proficient in non-English languages. NELP is consistently associated with worse postoperative outcomes, lower patient-reported outcome scores, and disparities in access to care. Studies have shown that language discordance contributes to miscommunication, reduced satisfaction, and suboptimal recovery. Despite federal mandates requiring interpreter services, access remains inconsistent, and many institutions fall short in providing language-concordant care. Recent research supports interventions such as professional interpreter use, language-concordant provider matching, multilingual discharge instructions, validated non-English PROMs, as well as the use of artificial intelligence.</p> Summary <p>Language-related disparities in orthopaedic surgery are well-documented but under-addressed. Improving equity for patients with NELP will require system-wide efforts to standardize interpreter access, expand language-concordant care, and integrate emerging tools such as artificial intelligence to support communication across the surgical continuum.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Language Barriers in the Delivery of Musculoskeletal Care and Future Directions

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年6月20日

查看全文
  • Edgar Garcia‒Lopez,
  • Jamieson O’Marr,
  • Rachel Gottlieb,
  • Katherine Rebecca Miclau,
  • Nirav Pandya

摘要

Purpose of Review

Examine how language barriers impact musculoskeletal care in the United States, particularly for patients with non-English language preference (NELP), and to highlight strategies to improve equity in orthopaedic outcomes.

Recent Findings

In the U.S., 24.5 million individuals have NELP, yet few orthopaedic surgeons are proficient in non-English languages. NELP is consistently associated with worse postoperative outcomes, lower patient-reported outcome scores, and disparities in access to care. Studies have shown that language discordance contributes to miscommunication, reduced satisfaction, and suboptimal recovery. Despite federal mandates requiring interpreter services, access remains inconsistent, and many institutions fall short in providing language-concordant care. Recent research supports interventions such as professional interpreter use, language-concordant provider matching, multilingual discharge instructions, validated non-English PROMs, as well as the use of artificial intelligence.

Summary

Language-related disparities in orthopaedic surgery are well-documented but under-addressed. Improving equity for patients with NELP will require system-wide efforts to standardize interpreter access, expand language-concordant care, and integrate emerging tools such as artificial intelligence to support communication across the surgical continuum.