<p>Honey consumption is increasing worldwide due to its natural qualities, but its safety and authenticity are not always assured. Honey adulteration through mislabeling and fraudulent production significantly damages consumer trust and poses health risks. This study aimed to identify the botanical makeup of Kazakh and imported Honey to assess whether it matches with the declared labeling using melissopalynological analysis and DNA metabarcoding. During our research, melissopalynological analysis showed that 64.7% of Kazakh Honey samples and 62.5% of imported Honey matched the declared labeling. In 6 samples of domestic Honey and 6 samples of imported honey, the plant source differed from what was indicated on the label. According to DNA metabarcoding data, the botanical origin of honey by the <i>ITS2</i> marker was confirmed in 58.8% of Kazakh and 31.25% of imported honey samples. Using the <i>rbcL</i> marker, only 29.4% of domestic and 31.25% of imported honey samples matched the declared plant origin. Agreement between melissopalynology and <i>ITS2</i> marker data was observed in 10 samples, and between melissopalynology and <i>rbcL</i> in 8 samples. Eight samples also matched the labeling based on both genetic markers. Thus, combining DNA metabarcoding with melissopalinological analysis enables a more accurate identification of the honey's botanical origin, thereby strengthening product authenticity control, helping to detect counterfeits, facilitating access to international markets, and increasing consumer confidence. Overall, the results highlight the importance of strict monitoring and verification methods to protect consumers and maintain market integrity.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Identifying Honey Species Composition and Verifying Label Accuracy Using Melissopalynological Analysis and DNA Metabarcoding

  • Saule Daugaliyeva,
  • Aida Daugaliyeva,
  • Katira Amirova,
  • Akmeiir Yelubayeva,
  • Nurlan Toktarov,
  • Simone Peletto

摘要

Honey consumption is increasing worldwide due to its natural qualities, but its safety and authenticity are not always assured. Honey adulteration through mislabeling and fraudulent production significantly damages consumer trust and poses health risks. This study aimed to identify the botanical makeup of Kazakh and imported Honey to assess whether it matches with the declared labeling using melissopalynological analysis and DNA metabarcoding. During our research, melissopalynological analysis showed that 64.7% of Kazakh Honey samples and 62.5% of imported Honey matched the declared labeling. In 6 samples of domestic Honey and 6 samples of imported honey, the plant source differed from what was indicated on the label. According to DNA metabarcoding data, the botanical origin of honey by the ITS2 marker was confirmed in 58.8% of Kazakh and 31.25% of imported honey samples. Using the rbcL marker, only 29.4% of domestic and 31.25% of imported honey samples matched the declared plant origin. Agreement between melissopalynology and ITS2 marker data was observed in 10 samples, and between melissopalynology and rbcL in 8 samples. Eight samples also matched the labeling based on both genetic markers. Thus, combining DNA metabarcoding with melissopalinological analysis enables a more accurate identification of the honey's botanical origin, thereby strengthening product authenticity control, helping to detect counterfeits, facilitating access to international markets, and increasing consumer confidence. Overall, the results highlight the importance of strict monitoring and verification methods to protect consumers and maintain market integrity.