Scholarlink

<p>Extensive evidence shows that high meat consumption is associated with negative environmental and health consequences. Yet right-wing and conservative individuals consistently report higher meat consumption and lower willingness to reduce it. While ideological differences in dietary choices are well documented, less is known about the psychological mechanisms underlying these differences.</p><p>We propose that political differences in meat-reduction intentions may partly stem from differences in awareness of the environmental and health consequences of meat consumption. Using a nationally representative sample of 4,066 Italian adults, we examined whether awareness of these consequences mediates the association between political orientation and ideology and intentions to reduce or replace meat consumption.</p><p>Results showed that conservatives and right-wing individuals reported lower environmental and health awareness of the consequences of meat consumption, which in turn was associated with weaker intentions to reduce or replace meat. Awareness consistently mediated the relationship between political variables and dietary intentions, with health-related awareness showing particularly strong associations.</p><p>These findings suggest that ideological differences in meat consumption could be partly explained by modifiable psychological factors related to consequence awareness. By identifying concrete and malleable mechanisms, this study provides actionable insights for the design of public health and environmental communication strategies aimed at reducing meat consumption across the political spectrum.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Understanding political differences in meat reduction and replacement intentions: the role of awareness of consequences

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年6月18日

查看全文
  • Luca Cussigh,
  • Giulia Scaglioni,
  • Margherita Guidetti,
  • Michela Lenzi,
  • Davide Naddeo,
  • Valentina Carfora,
  • Luciana Carraro

摘要

Extensive evidence shows that high meat consumption is associated with negative environmental and health consequences. Yet right-wing and conservative individuals consistently report higher meat consumption and lower willingness to reduce it. While ideological differences in dietary choices are well documented, less is known about the psychological mechanisms underlying these differences.

We propose that political differences in meat-reduction intentions may partly stem from differences in awareness of the environmental and health consequences of meat consumption. Using a nationally representative sample of 4,066 Italian adults, we examined whether awareness of these consequences mediates the association between political orientation and ideology and intentions to reduce or replace meat consumption.

Results showed that conservatives and right-wing individuals reported lower environmental and health awareness of the consequences of meat consumption, which in turn was associated with weaker intentions to reduce or replace meat. Awareness consistently mediated the relationship between political variables and dietary intentions, with health-related awareness showing particularly strong associations.

These findings suggest that ideological differences in meat consumption could be partly explained by modifiable psychological factors related to consequence awareness. By identifying concrete and malleable mechanisms, this study provides actionable insights for the design of public health and environmental communication strategies aimed at reducing meat consumption across the political spectrum.