Scholarlink

<p>Online engagement with extremist communities presents significant mental health and real-world risks. This study investigated how patterns of engagement within an incel forum relate to dynamic affective and cognitive linguistic markers. Using longitudinal linear mixed models and Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) on a dataset of 2,009,875 comments, spanning six years, we compared users who permanently left (Desisters), those who persisted (Persisters), and those who left but later returned (Returners). Whilst overall differences between groups were minimal, distinct psychological trajectories emerged: Desisters showed an increase in grievances and hostility over time, whereas Persisters showed more stable emotions and increased social clout. Returners showed lower desperation and frustration following a period of disengagement, yet their re-engagement was marked by a significant decline in analytic thinking and a persistence of hate, signalling re-radicalisation. These findings highlight a novel, layered model of online radicalisation, offering insights for developing targeted clinical interventions.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The radicalisation loop: A layered linguistic model of disengagement and re-engagement in an incel forum

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年1月28日

查看全文
  • Melissa S. de Roos,
  • Giorgia Caon

摘要

Online engagement with extremist communities presents significant mental health and real-world risks. This study investigated how patterns of engagement within an incel forum relate to dynamic affective and cognitive linguistic markers. Using longitudinal linear mixed models and Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) on a dataset of 2,009,875 comments, spanning six years, we compared users who permanently left (Desisters), those who persisted (Persisters), and those who left but later returned (Returners). Whilst overall differences between groups were minimal, distinct psychological trajectories emerged: Desisters showed an increase in grievances and hostility over time, whereas Persisters showed more stable emotions and increased social clout. Returners showed lower desperation and frustration following a period of disengagement, yet their re-engagement was marked by a significant decline in analytic thinking and a persistence of hate, signalling re-radicalisation. These findings highlight a novel, layered model of online radicalisation, offering insights for developing targeted clinical interventions.