Scholarlink

<p>Despite warnings about the increasingly confrontational tone of political discourse, little research has experimentally examined the psychological impact that different political styles may have. We seek to fill this lacuna by investigating whether exposure to a type of political discourse labelled as ‘demagogic discourse’ fosters anti-democratic stances by threatening values and lowering political tolerance. To this end, we conducted three experiments in Spain and the U.S. (N<sub>total</sub>= 999), where exposure to demagogic v. moderate discourses was manipulated. Ideological affinity was also considered by manipulating whether the ideology of the discourse matched that of participants in Studies 1 and 2. We found support for our hypotheses, as exposure to demagogic discourse increased value threat and reduced political tolerance independent of ideological-matching. Yet, in the U.S., effects on tolerance were moderated by satisfaction with democracy. Ultimately, our research validates warnings about the dangers of demagogic political discourses at a psychological level.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Examining psychological effects of demagogic discourse on perceived threat and political intolerance

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年1月19日

查看全文
  • Marcos Dono,
  • Chantal D’Amore,
  • Mónica Alzate,
  • Marco Brambilla,
  • Martijn van Zomeren,
  • José Manuel Sabucedo

摘要

Despite warnings about the increasingly confrontational tone of political discourse, little research has experimentally examined the psychological impact that different political styles may have. We seek to fill this lacuna by investigating whether exposure to a type of political discourse labelled as ‘demagogic discourse’ fosters anti-democratic stances by threatening values and lowering political tolerance. To this end, we conducted three experiments in Spain and the U.S. (Ntotal= 999), where exposure to demagogic v. moderate discourses was manipulated. Ideological affinity was also considered by manipulating whether the ideology of the discourse matched that of participants in Studies 1 and 2. We found support for our hypotheses, as exposure to demagogic discourse increased value threat and reduced political tolerance independent of ideological-matching. Yet, in the U.S., effects on tolerance were moderated by satisfaction with democracy. Ultimately, our research validates warnings about the dangers of demagogic political discourses at a psychological level.