<p>This research aims to provide an alternative understanding of Sino–European Union (EU) coopetition emergence in green industry and to evaluate its implications. Previous studies have indicated that such coopetition is shaped by various external economic and geopolitical factors. Inspired by <i>zhongyong</i> (中庸, the Doctrine of the Mean) dialectics, the study suggests that Sino–EU cooperation and competition can be reciprocally transformed even in an increasingly competitive context. An examination of the interactions among electric vehicles, photovoltaic products and critical minerals revealed that the reciprocal transformations of coopetition in green industry were driven by the proactively flexible adaptations of both China and the EU to uncertainties. Both their partnership and their antagonism were controlled by these reciprocal transformations. The Sino–EU power relationship in green industry can be reified as coevolution. It is suggested that China and the EU underwent respective self-empowerments through constant vis-à-vis learning, but they did not have to empower each other. Such coevolution suggests that both intense competition and asymmetric cooperation do not proceed linearly.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The Sino–EU Reciprocal Transformation of Coopetition in Green Industry and Its Implications for Coevolution

  • Jingbo Wang,
  • Weijin Wang

摘要

This research aims to provide an alternative understanding of Sino–European Union (EU) coopetition emergence in green industry and to evaluate its implications. Previous studies have indicated that such coopetition is shaped by various external economic and geopolitical factors. Inspired by zhongyong (中庸, the Doctrine of the Mean) dialectics, the study suggests that Sino–EU cooperation and competition can be reciprocally transformed even in an increasingly competitive context. An examination of the interactions among electric vehicles, photovoltaic products and critical minerals revealed that the reciprocal transformations of coopetition in green industry were driven by the proactively flexible adaptations of both China and the EU to uncertainties. Both their partnership and their antagonism were controlled by these reciprocal transformations. The Sino–EU power relationship in green industry can be reified as coevolution. It is suggested that China and the EU underwent respective self-empowerments through constant vis-à-vis learning, but they did not have to empower each other. Such coevolution suggests that both intense competition and asymmetric cooperation do not proceed linearly.