<p>Millions of individuals work as temporary labor migrants, often in domestic roles, to escape unemployment and support their families through remittances. Labor migrants frequently face exploitation, yet many countries have been slow to reform employment systems for migrants, like the <i>kafala</i> (sponsorship) system common in the Gulf states. To better understand support for the <i>kafala</i> system, we applied System Justification Theory (SJT), a social and political psychology framework that explains why individuals defend the status quo, and surveyed 160 sponsors (<i>kafeels</i>) of housemaids (<i>khaddamahs</i>) in the United Arab Emirates. Our results revealed that justification of the <i>kafala</i> system was positively associated with sponsors’ identification with other sponsors and with life satisfaction, but was unrelated to need for cognition or to the working conditions of their housemaids. These findings contribute to understanding support for controversial labor systems and expand the application of SJT to the context of labor migration.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Using System Justification Theory to Explain the Support of Migrant Sponsorship in Gulf Countries (kafala)

  • Cornelius J. König,
  • Zafar Husain,
  • Denise Vesper,
  • Nida ul H. Bajwa

摘要

Millions of individuals work as temporary labor migrants, often in domestic roles, to escape unemployment and support their families through remittances. Labor migrants frequently face exploitation, yet many countries have been slow to reform employment systems for migrants, like the kafala (sponsorship) system common in the Gulf states. To better understand support for the kafala system, we applied System Justification Theory (SJT), a social and political psychology framework that explains why individuals defend the status quo, and surveyed 160 sponsors (kafeels) of housemaids (khaddamahs) in the United Arab Emirates. Our results revealed that justification of the kafala system was positively associated with sponsors’ identification with other sponsors and with life satisfaction, but was unrelated to need for cognition or to the working conditions of their housemaids. These findings contribute to understanding support for controversial labor systems and expand the application of SJT to the context of labor migration.