Scholarlink

<p>This research focuses on 10 case studies drawn from a corpus of 50 interviews with displaced Ukrainian women based in Berlin and Frankfurt/Oder and considers the extent to which Ukrainian refugee women arriving in Germany over the last two years might have experienced misrecognition within their everyday experiences. Following Honneth’s (1996) understanding of recognition in terms of self-confidence, self-respect and self-esteem, manifestations of recognition and misrecognition are centered around our Ukrainian interlocutors’ communicated experiences. Recognition or the lack thereof impacts our interlocutors’ sense of self and belonging in their new environments. According to our analysis, recognition manifested as ambivalent inclusion through recognition via [potential] employers, government officials or within interlocutors’ personal lives; it was equally highly contingent on interlocutors’ self-identification–personally (e.g. by their region of origin) or professionally (e.g. as activists, [prospective] employees), with obvious material (e.g. economic) and symbolic (communicative) components.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Manifestations of (Mis)Recognition Amongst Germany-based Refugee Women from Ukraine

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月21日

查看全文
  • Jonna Rock,
  • Rob Sharp

摘要

This research focuses on 10 case studies drawn from a corpus of 50 interviews with displaced Ukrainian women based in Berlin and Frankfurt/Oder and considers the extent to which Ukrainian refugee women arriving in Germany over the last two years might have experienced misrecognition within their everyday experiences. Following Honneth’s (1996) understanding of recognition in terms of self-confidence, self-respect and self-esteem, manifestations of recognition and misrecognition are centered around our Ukrainian interlocutors’ communicated experiences. Recognition or the lack thereof impacts our interlocutors’ sense of self and belonging in their new environments. According to our analysis, recognition manifested as ambivalent inclusion through recognition via [potential] employers, government officials or within interlocutors’ personal lives; it was equally highly contingent on interlocutors’ self-identification–personally (e.g. by their region of origin) or professionally (e.g. as activists, [prospective] employees), with obvious material (e.g. economic) and symbolic (communicative) components.