Scholarlink

<p>Refugee integration is a critical global concern, particularly in Refugee Hosting Countries (RHCs) like Uganda. This paper examines Uganda’s unique approach, focusing on the factors that influence the experiences of refugee and host youth aged 16–24&#xa0;years. Utilising the UK Home Office Indicators of Integration Framework, data from interviews and focus groups reveal the multidimensional nature of integration, with employment identified as a foundational domain. Uganda’s strategy intricately connects work with other integration domains, challenging conventional notions of a ‘successful’ integration process. The findings underscore the necessity for context-specific approaches that acknowledge the complexities surrounding work, rights, and land allocation within the broader integration framework. Despite Uganda’s progressive refugee policies, feelings of marginalisation and unequal rights persist between refugee and host communities. This study proposes several strategic pathways to address these challenges, drawing on successful practices from other contexts. Key recommendations include an urgent review of refugee citizenship and naturalisation processes, as well as a reassessment of the land allocation model to ensure higher quality land for new arrivals.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Employment as a Strategic Pathway for Refugee and Host Youth Integration in Uganda

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年3月24日

查看全文
  • Cedric Marvin Nkiko,
  • Frank Ahimbisibwe

摘要

Refugee integration is a critical global concern, particularly in Refugee Hosting Countries (RHCs) like Uganda. This paper examines Uganda’s unique approach, focusing on the factors that influence the experiences of refugee and host youth aged 16–24 years. Utilising the UK Home Office Indicators of Integration Framework, data from interviews and focus groups reveal the multidimensional nature of integration, with employment identified as a foundational domain. Uganda’s strategy intricately connects work with other integration domains, challenging conventional notions of a ‘successful’ integration process. The findings underscore the necessity for context-specific approaches that acknowledge the complexities surrounding work, rights, and land allocation within the broader integration framework. Despite Uganda’s progressive refugee policies, feelings of marginalisation and unequal rights persist between refugee and host communities. This study proposes several strategic pathways to address these challenges, drawing on successful practices from other contexts. Key recommendations include an urgent review of refugee citizenship and naturalisation processes, as well as a reassessment of the land allocation model to ensure higher quality land for new arrivals.