Scholarlink

<p>South Africa’s housing policy has long emphasised community participation and skills transfer in delivery as principles vital to addressing its housing shortage and affordability challenges. This rhetoric implies the empowerment of citizens as a solution and the notion that ‘participation leads to empowerment’ is the predominant discourse within South African policy. Yet its neoliberal influence to co-opt radical, insurgent resident practice is unremedied by state decision-makers. The 2008 Enhanced People’s Housing Process (EPHP) is a tool argued to offer local empowerment, potentially countering neoliberal policy. The EPHP is key to increased participation levels, enabling direct citizen involvement in housing by encouraging beneficiaries to participate in decision-making, public participation, and construction. The necessity for a deeper understanding of empowerment leads to analysing the EPHP’s principles in a spatial context, bringing forth the main research question of how the participatory aspirations of citizens fare against the EPHP. This paper adopts a qualitative research approach that critically analyses empowerment theory and the EPHP against the case study of Ruo Emoh – a medium-density housing development in Mitchells Plain, Cape Town that began as a savings scheme. This paper’s two arguments of participatory governance not guaranteeing citizen empowerment and citizen empowerment rhetoric not guaranteeing skills transfer in delivery can be attributed to the discretionary implementation of the EPHP disempowering its beneficiaries by empowering the market. This is evident in Ruo Emoh’s process, which resulted in minimal participation of the scheme in delivery, abstract skills learning, and minimal influence on their housing outcomes. This paper critically examines the limitations of the EPHP’s participatory governance model, exposes the disconnect between policy rhetoric and its practical implementation, sheds light on the detrimental impact of neoliberal policies, and challenges the role of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) in housing policy. By exposing the limitations of the EPHP in Ruo Emoh, this paper emphasises the transformative potential of the social compact, where power lies within residents and marginalised communities, yet remains dormant due to policy not quantifying their active participation.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The Problems of the Discretionary Enhanced People’s Housing Process (EPHP) in the Ruo Emoh Housing Project

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月18日

查看全文
  • Jevon Jacobs

摘要

South Africa’s housing policy has long emphasised community participation and skills transfer in delivery as principles vital to addressing its housing shortage and affordability challenges. This rhetoric implies the empowerment of citizens as a solution and the notion that ‘participation leads to empowerment’ is the predominant discourse within South African policy. Yet its neoliberal influence to co-opt radical, insurgent resident practice is unremedied by state decision-makers. The 2008 Enhanced People’s Housing Process (EPHP) is a tool argued to offer local empowerment, potentially countering neoliberal policy. The EPHP is key to increased participation levels, enabling direct citizen involvement in housing by encouraging beneficiaries to participate in decision-making, public participation, and construction. The necessity for a deeper understanding of empowerment leads to analysing the EPHP’s principles in a spatial context, bringing forth the main research question of how the participatory aspirations of citizens fare against the EPHP. This paper adopts a qualitative research approach that critically analyses empowerment theory and the EPHP against the case study of Ruo Emoh – a medium-density housing development in Mitchells Plain, Cape Town that began as a savings scheme. This paper’s two arguments of participatory governance not guaranteeing citizen empowerment and citizen empowerment rhetoric not guaranteeing skills transfer in delivery can be attributed to the discretionary implementation of the EPHP disempowering its beneficiaries by empowering the market. This is evident in Ruo Emoh’s process, which resulted in minimal participation of the scheme in delivery, abstract skills learning, and minimal influence on their housing outcomes. This paper critically examines the limitations of the EPHP’s participatory governance model, exposes the disconnect between policy rhetoric and its practical implementation, sheds light on the detrimental impact of neoliberal policies, and challenges the role of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) in housing policy. By exposing the limitations of the EPHP in Ruo Emoh, this paper emphasises the transformative potential of the social compact, where power lies within residents and marginalised communities, yet remains dormant due to policy not quantifying their active participation.