<p>Perspective-taking—the capacity to understand others’ thoughts and feelings from their point of view—is foundational to effective social interaction. Recent conceptualizations in relational frame theory (RFT) offer a rigorous framework for training perspective-taking through deictic relational frames. However, existing RFT-based interventions often fall short in terms of ecological validity. Moreover, their individualistic orientation is not grounded in social interaction, and they tend to underestimate emotional processes. This limits their generalizability to real-life interpersonal contexts. This review identifies two primary limitations of current RFT-based approaches: (1) underestimation and insufficient integration of emotional (empathic) processes and (2) training protocols that diverge from naturalistic social settings. I utilized the organizational model (Davis, <CitationRef CitationID="CR8">1994</CitationRef>), which highlights dynamic reciprocal interactions between cognitive perspective-taking and emotional empathy, to address these limitations. Drawing from empirical research across clinical, educational, and organizational domains, I outline conceptual and methodological strategies for integrating emotional resonance and real-world contextualization into RFT-based training. This perspective aims to bridge the gap between theoretical precision and practical relevance, fostering interventions that more faithfully mirror human social functioning.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Integration of Theories of Perspective-Taking for Enhancing Ecological Validity: Focus on Relational Frame Theory

  • Yasuhiro Ooshima

摘要

Perspective-taking—the capacity to understand others’ thoughts and feelings from their point of view—is foundational to effective social interaction. Recent conceptualizations in relational frame theory (RFT) offer a rigorous framework for training perspective-taking through deictic relational frames. However, existing RFT-based interventions often fall short in terms of ecological validity. Moreover, their individualistic orientation is not grounded in social interaction, and they tend to underestimate emotional processes. This limits their generalizability to real-life interpersonal contexts. This review identifies two primary limitations of current RFT-based approaches: (1) underestimation and insufficient integration of emotional (empathic) processes and (2) training protocols that diverge from naturalistic social settings. I utilized the organizational model (Davis, 1994), which highlights dynamic reciprocal interactions between cognitive perspective-taking and emotional empathy, to address these limitations. Drawing from empirical research across clinical, educational, and organizational domains, I outline conceptual and methodological strategies for integrating emotional resonance and real-world contextualization into RFT-based training. This perspective aims to bridge the gap between theoretical precision and practical relevance, fostering interventions that more faithfully mirror human social functioning.