Scholarlink

<p>This study addresses the research problem of how meritocracy is systematically eroded and nepotism institutionalised within academic appointment processes. Employing a qualitative phenomenological design, semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine academics to explore their lived experiences. Findings reveal a dual mechanism of nepotism: the artificial construction of merit for favoured individuals “merit-mimicry” and “negative nepotism” via bureaucratic gatekeeping that deliberately excludes meritorious outsiders. The study concludes that nepotism operates not merely as a kinship-based anomaly but as a defensive organisational pathology that mimics meritocratic compliance, ultimately eroding organisational justice. To counter this, institutions should implement qualitative merit-congruence audits and establish independent ombudsperson systems. This paper contributes to the literature by conceptualising “merit-mimicry” and expanding social closure theory within the context of neoliberal academic capitalism. </p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The Erosion of the Merit Principle in Academic Appointments and Promotions: The Phenomenon of Nepotism at Turkish Universities

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月30日

查看全文
  • Muhammet Fatih Doğan

摘要

This study addresses the research problem of how meritocracy is systematically eroded and nepotism institutionalised within academic appointment processes. Employing a qualitative phenomenological design, semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine academics to explore their lived experiences. Findings reveal a dual mechanism of nepotism: the artificial construction of merit for favoured individuals “merit-mimicry” and “negative nepotism” via bureaucratic gatekeeping that deliberately excludes meritorious outsiders. The study concludes that nepotism operates not merely as a kinship-based anomaly but as a defensive organisational pathology that mimics meritocratic compliance, ultimately eroding organisational justice. To counter this, institutions should implement qualitative merit-congruence audits and establish independent ombudsperson systems. This paper contributes to the literature by conceptualising “merit-mimicry” and expanding social closure theory within the context of neoliberal academic capitalism.