Objective <p>To assess the comparative efficacy of various maintenance strategies for patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL).</p> Methods <p>We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized clinical trials evaluating maintenance strategies in previously untreated DLBCL patients. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The secondary outcomes were PFS at 24&#xa0;months (PFS24) and Safety. A network meta-analysis using a random effects consistency model was performed to synthesize the evidence. No maintenance was used as the common comparator, and the effect of placebo was considered equivalent to no treatment.</p> Results <p>A total of ten trials involving 3830 patients and seven maintenance options were included. Significant PFS benefits were observed with lenalidomide (HR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.53–0.94) and rituximab (HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.64–0.92) maintenance compared with no maintenance. No maintenance intervention significantly improved OS. However, our findings first demonstrated that rituximab maintenance treatment was significantly associated with improved PFS24 in previously untreated patients (RR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.02–1.11). The quality of evidence was low because of incoherence, as assessed by the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) tool. Subgroup analysis revealed that rituximab maintenance was particularly beneficial for high-risk and male patients, with a potential OS benefit for male patients.</p> Conclusion <p>Maintenance therapy, particularly rituximab, provides a prognosis benefit for patients with previously untreated DLBCL. Specific subgroups, such as male patients, may derive additional benefits from maintenance therapy.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Maintenance treatment and survival in patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B cell lymphoma in the immunochemotherapy era: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

  • Jing Wang,
  • Dongming Zhou,
  • Chenglan Lv,
  • Min Zhou,
  • Jingyan Xu,
  • Rongfu Zhou,
  • Yuan Wan

摘要

Objective

To assess the comparative efficacy of various maintenance strategies for patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized clinical trials evaluating maintenance strategies in previously untreated DLBCL patients. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The secondary outcomes were PFS at 24 months (PFS24) and Safety. A network meta-analysis using a random effects consistency model was performed to synthesize the evidence. No maintenance was used as the common comparator, and the effect of placebo was considered equivalent to no treatment.

Results

A total of ten trials involving 3830 patients and seven maintenance options were included. Significant PFS benefits were observed with lenalidomide (HR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.53–0.94) and rituximab (HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.64–0.92) maintenance compared with no maintenance. No maintenance intervention significantly improved OS. However, our findings first demonstrated that rituximab maintenance treatment was significantly associated with improved PFS24 in previously untreated patients (RR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.02–1.11). The quality of evidence was low because of incoherence, as assessed by the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) tool. Subgroup analysis revealed that rituximab maintenance was particularly beneficial for high-risk and male patients, with a potential OS benefit for male patients.

Conclusion

Maintenance therapy, particularly rituximab, provides a prognosis benefit for patients with previously untreated DLBCL. Specific subgroups, such as male patients, may derive additional benefits from maintenance therapy.