<p>This study examines how territorial development levels condition the effectiveness of public sustainability investment across Colombian regions (2014–2024). Using panel threshold models and spatial analysis of 32 departments, we identify two development thresholds creating distinct investment–outcome regimes. Medium-development territories show the highest investment returns (β = 0.487), while low-development areas exhibit limited effectiveness (β = 0.132) and high-development regions show diminishing returns (β = 0.283). Mediation analysis reveals that institutional capacity and infrastructure quality are the primary mediating channels through which investment affects socio-environmental resilience. These findings suggest that spatially differentiated investment strategies outperform uniform allocation models in heterogeneous territorial contexts.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Territorial development thresholds and the spatial effectiveness of sustainability investment: evidence from Colombian regions

  • Mario de la Puente,
  • Jose Torres,
  • Hernan Guzman,
  • Anderson Dominguez,
  • Juan Lamby

摘要

This study examines how territorial development levels condition the effectiveness of public sustainability investment across Colombian regions (2014–2024). Using panel threshold models and spatial analysis of 32 departments, we identify two development thresholds creating distinct investment–outcome regimes. Medium-development territories show the highest investment returns (β = 0.487), while low-development areas exhibit limited effectiveness (β = 0.132) and high-development regions show diminishing returns (β = 0.283). Mediation analysis reveals that institutional capacity and infrastructure quality are the primary mediating channels through which investment affects socio-environmental resilience. These findings suggest that spatially differentiated investment strategies outperform uniform allocation models in heterogeneous territorial contexts.