<p>Brain-Machine Interfaces (BMIs) hold significant promise for the neurorehabilitation of patients with lower-limb impairments. However, their widespread clinical adoption is hindered by high costs and system complexity. This study presents an open-loop, low-cost EEG-based BMI designed to assess the cognitive implication of users during assisted cycling therapy. The system computes two cognitive indices: a <i>low-frequency index</i>, associated with motor-related engagement, and a <i>high-frequency index</i>, related to attention during motor tasks. These indices are obtained using Filter Bank Common Spatial Patterns (FBCSP) and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), enabling continuous monitoring of cognitive involvement. Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation (LOOCV) results showed a clear increase in both indices during motor engagement compared to relaxed states in healthy subjects (low-frequency: <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(33.4 \pm 7.1\%\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> to <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(65.1 \pm 10.6\%\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>; high-frequency: <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(28.1 \pm 9.7\%\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> to <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(61.0 \pm 11.2\%\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>), whereas patients exhibited smaller increments (low-frequency: <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(39.9 \pm 4.5\%\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> to <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(53.8 \pm 10.3\%\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>; high-frequency: <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(34.0 \pm 4.2\%\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> to <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(48.0 \pm 15.6\%\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>). During validation trials, index differences between relax periods and motor engagement periods reveal a mean separation of <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(21.0 \pm 16.3\%\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> (low-frequency) and <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(15.4 \pm 7.9\%\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> (high-frequency) in control subjects, compared to <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(2.8 \pm 7.6\%\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(2.4 \pm 2.5\%\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> in patients. Results suggest that the metrics obtained by the present BMI can be a useful asset to evaluate patients’ performance, engagement and fatigue during neurorehabilitation.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Analysis of a BMI System for the Assessment of Cognitive Motor Engagement for the Neurorehabilitation of Patients with Lower-Limb Impairment

  • Carlo Cavaliere-Ballesta,
  • Mario Ortiz,
  • Vicente Quiles,
  • Cristina Polo-Hortigüela,
  • Isabel Sinovas-Alonso,
  • Eduardo Iáñez,
  • José M. Azorín

摘要

Brain-Machine Interfaces (BMIs) hold significant promise for the neurorehabilitation of patients with lower-limb impairments. However, their widespread clinical adoption is hindered by high costs and system complexity. This study presents an open-loop, low-cost EEG-based BMI designed to assess the cognitive implication of users during assisted cycling therapy. The system computes two cognitive indices: a low-frequency index, associated with motor-related engagement, and a high-frequency index, related to attention during motor tasks. These indices are obtained using Filter Bank Common Spatial Patterns (FBCSP) and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), enabling continuous monitoring of cognitive involvement. Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation (LOOCV) results showed a clear increase in both indices during motor engagement compared to relaxed states in healthy subjects (low-frequency: \(33.4 \pm 7.1\%\) to \(65.1 \pm 10.6\%\) ; high-frequency: \(28.1 \pm 9.7\%\) to \(61.0 \pm 11.2\%\) ), whereas patients exhibited smaller increments (low-frequency: \(39.9 \pm 4.5\%\) to \(53.8 \pm 10.3\%\) ; high-frequency: \(34.0 \pm 4.2\%\) to \(48.0 \pm 15.6\%\) ). During validation trials, index differences between relax periods and motor engagement periods reveal a mean separation of \(21.0 \pm 16.3\%\) (low-frequency) and \(15.4 \pm 7.9\%\) (high-frequency) in control subjects, compared to \(2.8 \pm 7.6\%\) and \(2.4 \pm 2.5\%\) in patients. Results suggest that the metrics obtained by the present BMI can be a useful asset to evaluate patients’ performance, engagement and fatigue during neurorehabilitation.