Scholarlink

Importance <p>Inadequate selection of patients for thyroid biopsy contributes and precedes thyroid cancer overdiagnosis.</p> Objective <p>To assess the feasibility of a multicenter randomized trial evaluating a conversation aid for patients with thyroid nodules.</p> Design <p>Pilot encounter level randomized trial.</p> Setting <p>Two US academic centers.</p> Participants <p>Clinicians who routinely engaged in discussions with patients about thyroid nodules and their eligible patients, i.e., English-speaking adults (aged ≥ 18 years) presenting for initial evaluation of a thyroid nodule. Patients were excluded if they had hyperthyroidism, were pregnant, had already undergone a biopsy of the nodule of interest, or had received counseling for thyroid nodule management within the year before their visit.</p> Intervention <p>Encounters were randomized to either usual care alone or usual care plus a conversation aid.</p> Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s) <p>The primary outcome was feasibility of implementing study procedures. Secondarily, we assessed the aids’ impact on shared decision-making and clinical outcomes. We used the Observing Patient Involvement in Decision Making (OPTION-12) scale to assess the observed extent to which clinicians sought to involve patients in decision making.</p> Results <p>During the study, we screened 531 patients scheduled for thyroid nodule evaluation and found 213 (40%) eligible; of these, 120 (56%) attended their clinic visit and were invited to participate. Of those, 90 (75%) agreed to participate. Post-visit surveys were completed by 98% of patients, and clinical visit recordings obtained for 99% of encounters. The trial included 43 patients in each arm, most of whom were women (80%), mean age 57 years (SD 16). Encounter duration averaged 22&#xa0;min, in both groups. Compared to usual care alone, usual care plus conversation aid yielded higher OPTION-12 scores (34 vs. 21, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), more frequent discussion of alternative approaches (91 vs. 65% <i>p</i> = 0.008), and fewer decisions to pursue nodule biopsy (40 vs. 51%, <i>p</i> = 0.386).</p> Conclusions and Relevance <p>This study demonstrates the feasibility of procedures needed to conduct a multicenter randomized trial assessing the efficacy of a conversation aid. Preliminary outcomes suggest that the aid may favorably affect the care of patients with thyroid nodules.</p> Trial registration <p>NCT04463719.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Evaluation of a conversation aid for patients with thyroid nodules considering a biopsy: pilot multicenter randomized control trial

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月9日

查看全文
  • Sandra Algarin Perneth,
  • Urja Patel,
  • Andrea Ortiz Rocha,
  • Diana Barb,
  • Gonzalo Acosta,
  • Ashok Srihari,
  • Peter Dziegielewski,
  • M Regina Castro,
  • Diana Dean,
  • Mabel Ryder,
  • Ian Hargraves,
  • Carma Bylund,
  • Arkaprava Roy,
  • Zhongyue Zhang,
  • Victor M. Montori,
  • Juan P. Brito,
  • Naykky M Singh Ospina

摘要

Importance

Inadequate selection of patients for thyroid biopsy contributes and precedes thyroid cancer overdiagnosis.

Objective

To assess the feasibility of a multicenter randomized trial evaluating a conversation aid for patients with thyroid nodules.

Design

Pilot encounter level randomized trial.

Setting

Two US academic centers.

Participants

Clinicians who routinely engaged in discussions with patients about thyroid nodules and their eligible patients, i.e., English-speaking adults (aged ≥ 18 years) presenting for initial evaluation of a thyroid nodule. Patients were excluded if they had hyperthyroidism, were pregnant, had already undergone a biopsy of the nodule of interest, or had received counseling for thyroid nodule management within the year before their visit.

Intervention

Encounters were randomized to either usual care alone or usual care plus a conversation aid.

Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s)

The primary outcome was feasibility of implementing study procedures. Secondarily, we assessed the aids’ impact on shared decision-making and clinical outcomes. We used the Observing Patient Involvement in Decision Making (OPTION-12) scale to assess the observed extent to which clinicians sought to involve patients in decision making.

Results

During the study, we screened 531 patients scheduled for thyroid nodule evaluation and found 213 (40%) eligible; of these, 120 (56%) attended their clinic visit and were invited to participate. Of those, 90 (75%) agreed to participate. Post-visit surveys were completed by 98% of patients, and clinical visit recordings obtained for 99% of encounters. The trial included 43 patients in each arm, most of whom were women (80%), mean age 57 years (SD 16). Encounter duration averaged 22 min, in both groups. Compared to usual care alone, usual care plus conversation aid yielded higher OPTION-12 scores (34 vs. 21, p < 0.001), more frequent discussion of alternative approaches (91 vs. 65% p = 0.008), and fewer decisions to pursue nodule biopsy (40 vs. 51%, p = 0.386).

Conclusions and Relevance

This study demonstrates the feasibility of procedures needed to conduct a multicenter randomized trial assessing the efficacy of a conversation aid. Preliminary outcomes suggest that the aid may favorably affect the care of patients with thyroid nodules.

Trial registration

NCT04463719.