Comparison of four confirmatory tests for the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism: Bayesian analysis in the absence of a gold standard

期刊论文
发表日期：

2024年7月15日

查看全文

Hang Shen,
Wenjin Luo,
Jinbo Hu,
Jun Yang,
Ying Song,
Xiangjun Chen,
Yi Yang,
Linqiang Ma,
Qingfeng Cheng,
Zhihong Wang,
Qifu Li,
Shumin Yang,
Qifu Li,
Ying Song,
Shumin Yang,
Wenwen He,
Mei Mei,
Jinbo Hu,
Suxin Luo,
Kangla Liao,
Yao Zhang,
Yunfeng He,
Yihong He,
Ming Xiao,
Bin Peng

摘要

Background

Captopril challenge test (CCT), seated saline infusion test (SSIT), oral sodium loading test (OSLT) and fludrocortisone suppression test (FST) are widely used diagnostic tests for primary aldosteronism (PA). These tests differ in terms of safety and complexity. Whether the simpler tests (CCT and SSIT) are comparable in diagnostic performance to the more complex ones (FST and OSLT) is unclear.

Purpose

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of the four tests.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of hypertensive patients who were screened for PA and completed at least one confirmatory test. The patients were divided into two cohorts: one including those who completed one to three tests was used for the estimation of sensitivity and specificity. The other including those who completed four tests was used for the comparison of accuracy. Bayesian method was used to obtain the sensitivity, specificity, and Youden index of each test.

Results

The study included 1011 hypertensive patients. Among them, 895 patients completed one to three tests (including 889 CCT, 605 FST, 611 SSIT and 69 OSLT), and 116 patients completed four tests. SSIT had the highest sensitivity of 0.82(95% CI 0.78–0.86) but the lowest specificity of 0.76(0.70–0.80). OSLT had the lowest sensitivity of 0.65(0.56–0.75) but the highest specificity of 0.91(0.82–0.96). The sensitivity and specificity were 0.78 (95% CI, 0.75–0.82), 0.82 (95% CI, 0.78–0.85), for CCT, and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.73–0.81), 0.87 (95% CI, 0.82–0.91) for FST, respectively. The Youden index was not significantly different among the four tests[0.60(0.55–0.65) for CCT; 0.58(0.51–0.64) for SSIT; (0.64(0.57–0.69) for FST; 0.56(0.43–0.67) for OSLT].

Conclusion

The accuracy of simpler tests is comparable to the more complex ones. Considering the safety and simplicity of CCT, it may be a reasonable first choice when confirming the diagnosis of PA.