错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Development of a simplified new method of bone age estimation using three bones of the hand and wrist

  • Vaman Khadilkar,
  • Shruti Mondkar,
  • Keyur Desai,
  • Chirantap Oza,
  • Sushil Yewale,
  • Nimisha Dange,
  • Nikhil Lohiya,
  • Prashant Patil,
  • Hemchand Krishna Prasad,
  • Nikhil Shah,
  • Madhura Karguppikar,
  • Ankita Maheshwari,
  • Anuradha Khadilkar

摘要

Abstract

Though the Greulich and Pyle (GP) method is easy, inter-observer variability, differential maturation of hand bones influences ratings. The Tanner-Whitehouse (TW) method is more accurate, but cumbersome. A simpler method combining the above, such that it utilizes fewer bones without affecting accuracy, would be widely used and more applicable in clinical practice.

Objectives

1. Devising a simplified method utilizing three bones of the hand and wrist for bone age (BA) assessment. 2. Testing whether the 3 bone method gives comparable results to standard methods (GP,TW2,TW3) in Indian children.

Methods

Developmental stages and corresponding BA for radius, hamate, terminal phalanx (left middle finger) epiphyses combining stages from GP,TW3 atlases were described; BA were rated by two blinded observers. 3 bone method ratings were compared with the same dataset analyzed earlier using GP,TW2,TW3 (4 raters).

Results

Radiographs analysed:493 (Girls=226). Mean chronological age:9.4 ± 4.6 yrs, mean BA 3 bone:9.8 ± 4.8 yrs, GP:9.6 ± 4.8 yrs, TW3:9.3 ± 4.5 yrs, TW2:9.9 ± 5.0 yrs. The 3 bone method demonstrated no significant inter-observer variability (p = 0.3, mean difference = 0.02 ± 0.6 yrs); a strong positive correlation (p < 0.0001) with GP (r = 0.985), TW3 (r = 0.983) and TW2 (r = 0.982) was noted. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated good agreement; the root mean square errors between 3 bone and GP,TW3,TW2 ratings were 0.6,0.7,0.6 years; mean differences were 0.19,0.49,−0.14 years respectively. Greatest proportion of outliers (beyond ±1.96 SD of mean difference) was between 6 and 8 years age for difference in 3 bone and GP, and between 4–6 years for difference in 3 bone and TW3,TW2.

Conclusion

The 3 bone method has multiple advantages; it is easier, tackles differential maturation of wrist and hand bones, has good reproducibility, without compromising on accuracy rendering it suitable for office practice.