Scholarlink

Purpose of Review <p>Cancer therapy–related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) remains a significant risk of contemporary cancer treatment. Despite advances in oncologic therapies, cardiac surveillance strategies have largely relied on uniform, intensive monitoring, often without consideration of individual cardiotoxicity risk. This review evaluates the rationale for transitioning from blanket surveillance to risk-based, personalized cardiac monitoring strategies, especially for HER2-targeted therapy.</p> Recent Findings <p>Evolving definitions of CTRCD and improved risk stratification tools, have highlighted substantial heterogeneity in cardiotoxicity risk. Prospective studies in low-risk patients receiving non-anthracycline HER2-targeted therapies demonstrate that reduced-frequency echocardiographic surveillance appears safe and does not compromise cardiovascular or oncologic outcomes. Similar paradigms need to be studied for other cardiotoxic therapies, including BRAF/MEK inhibitors and VEGF inhibitors, with a need for prospective validation before clinical application.</p> Summary <p>Risk-adapted cardiac surveillance offers a pragmatic, evidence-based approach to optimize resource utilization while maintaining patient safety. Future research should focus on prospective validation and guideline harmonization to enable personalized cardio-oncology care.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Time to Personalize Surveillance for Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiac Dysfunction in HER2-Targeted Therapy: One Size Does Not Fit All

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月22日

查看全文
  • Sara Ebrahimi,
  • Lalith Vardhan Namburu,
  • Anita Deswal

摘要

Purpose of Review

Cancer therapy–related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) remains a significant risk of contemporary cancer treatment. Despite advances in oncologic therapies, cardiac surveillance strategies have largely relied on uniform, intensive monitoring, often without consideration of individual cardiotoxicity risk. This review evaluates the rationale for transitioning from blanket surveillance to risk-based, personalized cardiac monitoring strategies, especially for HER2-targeted therapy.

Recent Findings

Evolving definitions of CTRCD and improved risk stratification tools, have highlighted substantial heterogeneity in cardiotoxicity risk. Prospective studies in low-risk patients receiving non-anthracycline HER2-targeted therapies demonstrate that reduced-frequency echocardiographic surveillance appears safe and does not compromise cardiovascular or oncologic outcomes. Similar paradigms need to be studied for other cardiotoxic therapies, including BRAF/MEK inhibitors and VEGF inhibitors, with a need for prospective validation before clinical application.

Summary

Risk-adapted cardiac surveillance offers a pragmatic, evidence-based approach to optimize resource utilization while maintaining patient safety. Future research should focus on prospective validation and guideline harmonization to enable personalized cardio-oncology care.