Purpose of Review <p>This review examines the current evidence and practical considerations for endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) in elderly patients, focusing on balancing the potential benefits and risks associated with endoscopic surveillance and eradication therapies in this population.</p> Recent Findings <p>Elderly patients with BE have a higher baseline prevalence of dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Additionally, the risk of progression from BE to EAC increases with advancing age, making surveillance particularly relevant in this population. However, recent studies suggest the benefits of surveillance decline with increasing age, greater comorbidities, and reduced life expectancy. Despite increasing awareness that ongoing surveillance endoscopy may be of minimal benefit for certain patient groups, there remains a paucity of data to guide decisions regarding discontinuation of surveillance.</p> Summary <p>The management of BE in elderly patients requires a careful balance between the potential benefits of endoscopic surveillance and eradication therapies and the risks and costs associated with repeated invasive procedures. Decisions to continue endoscopic surveillance in this population should be individualized, taking into account life-expectancy and comorbidities rather than focusing solely on chronological age.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Navigating Endoscopic Surveillance and Management of Barrett’s Esophagus in Elderly Patients: Balancing the Risks and Benefits

  • Natalie J. Wilson,
  • Cary C. Cotton,
  • Nicholas J. Shaheen

摘要

Purpose of Review

This review examines the current evidence and practical considerations for endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) in elderly patients, focusing on balancing the potential benefits and risks associated with endoscopic surveillance and eradication therapies in this population.

Recent Findings

Elderly patients with BE have a higher baseline prevalence of dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Additionally, the risk of progression from BE to EAC increases with advancing age, making surveillance particularly relevant in this population. However, recent studies suggest the benefits of surveillance decline with increasing age, greater comorbidities, and reduced life expectancy. Despite increasing awareness that ongoing surveillance endoscopy may be of minimal benefit for certain patient groups, there remains a paucity of data to guide decisions regarding discontinuation of surveillance.

Summary

The management of BE in elderly patients requires a careful balance between the potential benefits of endoscopic surveillance and eradication therapies and the risks and costs associated with repeated invasive procedures. Decisions to continue endoscopic surveillance in this population should be individualized, taking into account life-expectancy and comorbidities rather than focusing solely on chronological age.