<p>In the present paper, we are concerned with the analysis of the asymptotic characteristics of solutions within a new class of nonlinear fractional <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11868_2024_666_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="60" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(p(\textrm{x},.)-\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mtext>x</mtext> <mo>,</mo> <mo>.</mo> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo>-</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> Kirchhoff parabolic equations as follows: <Equation ID="Equ83"> <MediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="11868_2024_666_Article_Equ83.gif" Format="GIF" Height="75" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="472" /> </MediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\begin{aligned} \left\{ \begin{array}{lll} \displaystyle {\mathfrak {u}}_{t}+M \left( \left[ {\mathfrak {u}} \right] _{s}^{p(\textrm{x}, \textrm{y})}\right) {\mathfrak {L}}_{s}^{p(\textrm{x}, \textrm{y})} {\mathfrak {u}}= \vert {\mathfrak {u}}\vert ^{\sigma (\textrm{x})-2} {\mathfrak {u}} \log \vert {\mathfrak {u}}\vert ,\, \, &amp; \text{ in }\quad &amp; {\mathcal {U}} \times (0, T),\\ \displaystyle {\mathfrak {u}}(\textrm{x}, t)=0,\, \, &amp; \text{ in }\quad &amp; \partial {\mathcal {U}} \times (0, T),\\ \displaystyle {\mathfrak {u}}(\textrm{x}, 0)={\mathfrak {u}}_{0}(\textrm{x}), &amp; \text{ in }&amp; {\mathcal {U}}. \end{array} \right. \end{aligned}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <mrow> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd columnalign="right"> <mfenced open="{"> <mrow> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd columnalign="left"> <mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"> <mrow> <msub> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">u</mi> <mi>t</mi> </msub> <mo>+</mo> <mi>M</mi> <mfenced close=")" open="("> <msubsup> <mfenced close="]" open="["> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">u</mi> </mfenced> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mtext>x</mtext> <mo>,</mo> <mtext>y</mtext> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </msubsup> </mfenced> <msubsup> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">L</mi> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mtext>x</mtext> <mo>,</mo> <mtext>y</mtext> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </msubsup> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">u</mi> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">u</mi> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>σ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mtext>x</mtext> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo>-</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">u</mi> <mo>log</mo> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">u</mi> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> </mrow> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="0.166667em" /> <mspace width="0.166667em" /> </mrow> </mstyle> </mtd> <mtd columnalign="left"> <mrow> <mspace width="0.333333em" /> <mtext>in</mtext> <mspace width="0.333333em" /> <mspace width="1em" /> </mrow> </mtd> <mtd columnalign="left"> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="script">U</mi> <mo>×</mo> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>T</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd columnalign="left"> <mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"> <mrow> <mrow /> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">u</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mtext>x</mtext> <mo>,</mo> <mi>t</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="0.166667em" /> <mspace width="0.166667em" /> </mrow> </mstyle> </mtd> <mtd columnalign="left"> <mrow> <mspace width="0.333333em" /> <mtext>in</mtext> <mspace width="0.333333em" /> <mspace width="1em" /> </mrow> </mtd> <mtd columnalign="left"> <mrow> <mi>∂</mi> <mi mathvariant="script">U</mi> <mo>×</mo> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>T</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd columnalign="left"> <mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"> <mrow> <mrow /> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">u</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mtext>x</mtext> <mo>,</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>=</mo> <msub> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">u</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mtext>x</mtext> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </mstyle> </mtd> <mtd columnalign="left"> <mrow> <mspace width="0.333333em" /> <mtext>in</mtext> <mspace width="0.333333em" /> </mrow> </mtd> <mtd columnalign="left"> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="script">U</mi> <mo>.</mo> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </mrow> </mfenced> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </Equation>Using potential well theory, Gronwall’s inequality, and Komornik’s integral inequality, we give a classification of global existence and blow-up in finite time of solutions when the initial data satisfies different conditions. Moreover, we give two-sided estimates of asymptotic behavior when the diffusion term dominates the source.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Blow-up and global existence of solutions for a new class of parabolic \(p(\textrm{x}, \cdot )-\) Kirchhoff equation involving nonlinearity logarithmic

  • Ahmed Aberqi,
  • Abdesslam Ouaziz

摘要

In the present paper, we are concerned with the analysis of the asymptotic characteristics of solutions within a new class of nonlinear fractional \(p(\textrm{x},.)-\) p ( x , . ) - Kirchhoff parabolic equations as follows: \(\begin{aligned} \left\{ \begin{array}{lll} \displaystyle {\mathfrak {u}}_{t}+M \left( \left[ {\mathfrak {u}} \right] _{s}^{p(\textrm{x}, \textrm{y})}\right) {\mathfrak {L}}_{s}^{p(\textrm{x}, \textrm{y})} {\mathfrak {u}}= \vert {\mathfrak {u}}\vert ^{\sigma (\textrm{x})-2} {\mathfrak {u}} \log \vert {\mathfrak {u}}\vert ,\, \, & \text{ in }\quad & {\mathcal {U}} \times (0, T),\\ \displaystyle {\mathfrak {u}}(\textrm{x}, t)=0,\, \, & \text{ in }\quad & \partial {\mathcal {U}} \times (0, T),\\ \displaystyle {\mathfrak {u}}(\textrm{x}, 0)={\mathfrak {u}}_{0}(\textrm{x}), & \text{ in }& {\mathcal {U}}. \end{array} \right. \end{aligned}\) u t + M u s p ( x , y ) L s p ( x , y ) u = | u | σ ( x ) - 2 u log | u | , in U × ( 0 , T ) , u ( x , t ) = 0 , in U × ( 0 , T ) , u ( x , 0 ) = u 0 ( x ) , in U . Using potential well theory, Gronwall’s inequality, and Komornik’s integral inequality, we give a classification of global existence and blow-up in finite time of solutions when the initial data satisfies different conditions. Moreover, we give two-sided estimates of asymptotic behavior when the diffusion term dominates the source.