<p>We prove a skew generalization of the Newton–Puiseux theorem for the field <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(F=\bigcup\nolimits_{n=1}^{\infty} \, {\mathbb C}((x^{1 \over n}))\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <mi>F</mi> <mo>=</mo> <msubsup> <mo movablelimits="false">⋃</mo> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> <mspace width="thinmathspace" /> <mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">C</mi> </mrow> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msup> <mi>x</mi> <mrow> <mfrac> <mn>1</mn> <mi>n</mi> </mfrac> </mrow> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> of Puiseux series: For any positive real number <i>α</i>, we consider the ℂ-automorphism <i>σ</i> of <i>F</i> given by <i>x</i> ↦ <i>αx</i>, and prove that every non-constant polynomial in the skew polynomial ring <i>F</i>[<i>t, σ</i>] factors into a product of linear terms. This generalizes the classical theorem where <i>σ</i> = id, and gives the first concrete example of a field of characteristic 0 that is algebraically closed with respect to a non-trivial automorphism—a notion studied in works of Aryapoor and of Smith. Our result also resolves an open question of Aryapoor concerning such fields. A key ingredient in the proof is a new variant of Hensel’s lemma.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A skew Newton–Puiseux Theorem

  • Elad Paran,
  • Thieu N. Vo

摘要

We prove a skew generalization of the Newton–Puiseux theorem for the field \(F=\bigcup\nolimits_{n=1}^{\infty} \, {\mathbb C}((x^{1 \over n}))\) F = n = 1 C ( ( x 1 n ) ) of Puiseux series: For any positive real number α, we consider the ℂ-automorphism σ of F given by xαx, and prove that every non-constant polynomial in the skew polynomial ring F[t, σ] factors into a product of linear terms. This generalizes the classical theorem where σ = id, and gives the first concrete example of a field of characteristic 0 that is algebraically closed with respect to a non-trivial automorphism—a notion studied in works of Aryapoor and of Smith. Our result also resolves an open question of Aryapoor concerning such fields. A key ingredient in the proof is a new variant of Hensel’s lemma.