Background <p>Although the Incremental Shuttle Walk Test (ISWT) is commonly used in clinical and research settings, data on its reliability and measurement error indices remain insufficient.</p> Aims <p>To investigate the test–retest and inter-rater reliability of the ISWT in healthy university students and to establish reference values for measurement error indices.</p> Methods <p>Forty-nine participants were recruited, of whom 45 completed all testing procedures. Each participant performed four ISWTs—two administered by Rater 1 and two by Rater 2—across two sessions conducted 2–7 days apart. Test–retest and inter-rater reliability were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change at the 95% confidence level (MDC<sub>95</sub>), and Bland–Altman analyses.</p> Results <p>The mean ISWT distance was 638.44 ± 103.50 m and 646.67 ± 109.44 m for Rater 1 across sessions (p=0.255), and 621.11 ± 123.33 m and 654.00 ± 142.53 m for Rater 2 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Test–retest reliability was good to excellent, with ICCs of 0.899 for Rater 1 and 0.873 for Rater 2. Corresponding SEM and MDC<sub>95</sub> values were 33.83 m/93.71 m and 47.43 m/131.39 m, respectively. Inter-rater reliability was also good to excellent, with ICCs of 0.869 in Session 1 and 0.899 in Session 2. Bland–Altman analyses confirmed acceptable agreement.</p> Conclusions <p>The ISWT demonstrated good to excellent test–retest and inter-rater reliability, providing novel reference values for measurement error indices. These findings support its use as a reliable tool for assessing functional exercise capacity in both clinical and research settings.</p> Clinical trial registration <p>ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT06638281).</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Test–retest and inter-rater reliability of the incremental shuttle walk test in healthy university students

  • Yasemin Acar,
  • Gülsüm Tıkaç

摘要

Background

Although the Incremental Shuttle Walk Test (ISWT) is commonly used in clinical and research settings, data on its reliability and measurement error indices remain insufficient.

Aims

To investigate the test–retest and inter-rater reliability of the ISWT in healthy university students and to establish reference values for measurement error indices.

Methods

Forty-nine participants were recruited, of whom 45 completed all testing procedures. Each participant performed four ISWTs—two administered by Rater 1 and two by Rater 2—across two sessions conducted 2–7 days apart. Test–retest and inter-rater reliability were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change at the 95% confidence level (MDC95), and Bland–Altman analyses.

Results

The mean ISWT distance was 638.44 ± 103.50 m and 646.67 ± 109.44 m for Rater 1 across sessions (p=0.255), and 621.11 ± 123.33 m and 654.00 ± 142.53 m for Rater 2 (p < 0.001). Test–retest reliability was good to excellent, with ICCs of 0.899 for Rater 1 and 0.873 for Rater 2. Corresponding SEM and MDC95 values were 33.83 m/93.71 m and 47.43 m/131.39 m, respectively. Inter-rater reliability was also good to excellent, with ICCs of 0.869 in Session 1 and 0.899 in Session 2. Bland–Altman analyses confirmed acceptable agreement.

Conclusions

The ISWT demonstrated good to excellent test–retest and inter-rater reliability, providing novel reference values for measurement error indices. These findings support its use as a reliable tool for assessing functional exercise capacity in both clinical and research settings.

Clinical trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT06638281).