<p>The separation of methanol-carbon tetrachloride azeotropes presents significant challenges. Three strategies were evaluated: extractive distillation (ED) with p-cresol as the optimal entrainer, pressure-swing distillation (PSD) at 0.4/5&#xa0;atm, and azeotropic distillation (AD) using water. The separation sequence and operating parameters are optimized via different sequential iterative procedures, aiming to minimize the total annual cost (TAC). Two energy-saving technologies, namely heat-pump technology and heat-integration technology, were evaluated. The comprehensive economic and environmental assessment showed that the heat-pump AD process was optimal, with TAC reduced by 67.6% compared to ED and by 53.2% compared to PSD, and CO₂ emissions reduced by 49.0% compared to ED and by 41.7% compared to PSD.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Separation of Methanol-Carbon Tetrachloride Azeotropes: Process Optimization and Comparative Assessment of Energy-Efficient Strategies

  • Chuanwu Hu,
  • Jiemei Yu,
  • Chao Sun,
  • Zhankun Jiang,
  • Meilong Yuan,
  • Chao Hua

摘要

The separation of methanol-carbon tetrachloride azeotropes presents significant challenges. Three strategies were evaluated: extractive distillation (ED) with p-cresol as the optimal entrainer, pressure-swing distillation (PSD) at 0.4/5 atm, and azeotropic distillation (AD) using water. The separation sequence and operating parameters are optimized via different sequential iterative procedures, aiming to minimize the total annual cost (TAC). Two energy-saving technologies, namely heat-pump technology and heat-integration technology, were evaluated. The comprehensive economic and environmental assessment showed that the heat-pump AD process was optimal, with TAC reduced by 67.6% compared to ED and by 53.2% compared to PSD, and CO₂ emissions reduced by 49.0% compared to ED and by 41.7% compared to PSD.