Scholarlink

<p>This paper explores the problem of evaluating meta-arguments within the framework of heterogeneous logics. I introduce two new heterogeneous logics, <b>KLP</b> and <b>LK3</b>, which are based on the interpreted languages of <b>LP</b> and <b>K3</b>. I then present three distinct approaches to meta-argument evaluation, each aimed at preserving, in different ways, the heterogeneity of the underlying logics. Finally, I show that the second approach allows me to distinguish these new logics from others such as <b>TS</b> and <b>ST</b>, offering a more nuanced framework to address meta-argument distinctions in heterogeneous settings.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Meta-Arguments in Heterogeneous Logics and How to Evaluate Them

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月4日

查看全文
  • Christian Romero-Rodríguez

摘要

This paper explores the problem of evaluating meta-arguments within the framework of heterogeneous logics. I introduce two new heterogeneous logics, KLP and LK3, which are based on the interpreted languages of LP and K3. I then present three distinct approaches to meta-argument evaluation, each aimed at preserving, in different ways, the heterogeneity of the underlying logics. Finally, I show that the second approach allows me to distinguish these new logics from others such as TS and ST, offering a more nuanced framework to address meta-argument distinctions in heterogeneous settings.